Meet Anita Das ’83, M.S. ’87. Anita is a mostly-retired medical researcher specializing in infectious diseases and a UMBC planned giving donor. She still consults with biotech companies as a statistician to stay current with industry trends, and, in her spare time, Anita volunteers for environmental and educational causes, practices (and learns more about) permaculture, and goes on hiking adventures. In 2024, Anita established the Das Endowed Scholarship, and included UMBC in her estate plan to make sure she could help even more students in the future. Take it away, Anita!

Q: What is your WHY? What brought you to UMBC?

A: I went to UMBC because I wanted to study biology. At the time, I thought I wanted to go to medical school, and UMBC was known for having a strong pre-med program. I also received a small scholarship and played on the tennis team. I graduated with my B.S. in biological sciences in 1983, but decided that medical school was not for me. Since I had taken a lot of math classes (and done well), I got a job doing clinical research.

My boss told me I should pursue a master’s degree in statistics. So, I went back to UMBC. At the time, the statistics program was new, and I liked that it had a small number of students and that all of the professors were very interactive with the students. I earned my M.S. in statistics in 1987.

Q: What’s a memory of the UMBC community you have that helped shape your path?

A: I worked (or volunteered—I can’t remember which) at the math lab, which was a place that students came for tutoring. We provided support to students who needed extra help on their math assignments, but were more comfortable working with a peer than going to their professor. I remember this as a wonderful, supportive place that assisted many students and helped me gain and practice my teaching skills.

Q: Who in the UMBC community has inspired you or supported you?

A: While I was working on my master’s in statistics, Dr. Bimal Sinha was so supportive. On some of my homework assignments, instead of a grade, he would write “Please see me.” At first, I thought, “Oh no!” But in his office, he would help me through the work and encourage me. Dr. Sinha’s primary interest was to build my confidence and ensure I was learning. Really, all of the professors in my master’s program were student-oriented. They provided encouragement and instilled confidence, which enabled me to continue my education and get my Ph.D. in Epidemiology at George Washington University.

Q: Can you tell us more about your career?

A: My career has been in medical research, working on clinical trials in both the public and private sectors. I spent the first part of my career working in maternal/fetal medicine on National Institutes of Health grants and then moved to the pharmaceutical industry, specializing in the development of anti-infectives. Today, I am mostly retired and do some consulting with biotech companies as a statistician.

This allows me to stay current on new developments in infectious disease (my area of expertise) and work with experts in this field. I spend my non-work time volunteering for environmental and educational causes, learning and practicing permaculture, and going on hiking adventures.

Q: Can you elaborate on your volunteer work and what inspired you to establish a scholarship and become a planned giving donor?

A: I am on the Board of Directors of Sonoma Land Trust (SLT). We work to protect nature in my home county of Sonoma, California, helping to reduce climate impact, restoring habitats, and engaging young people in conservation. Our science-based approach allows me to use my education and experience for a good cause. SLT also mentors the next generation of scientists, and it was this program that inspired me to donate to UMBC to help educate those who will steward the future of our planet.

As part of my involvement with SLT, I had a chance to listen to high school students present conservation research they conducted on one of our land preserves. These kids were so excited about science and their joy was infectious. They inspired me to start a scholarship fund at UMBC so that anyone who wants to study science would not be limited by a lack of resources.

In 2024, I established the Das Endowed Scholarship to support students in the College of Natural and Mathematical Sciences. Around the same time, I also established a planned gift, naming UMBC in my estate plan to ensure my scholarship can support even more students in the future.

* * * * *

UMBC’s greatest strength is its people. When people meet Retrievers and hear about the passion they bring, the relationships they create, the ways they support each other, and the commitment they have to inclusive excellence, they truly get a sense of our community. That’s what “Meet a Retriever” is all about.

Learn more about how UMBC can help you achieve your goals.

Chance and faith: These two forces have shaped the trajectory of Jeanne van Briesen’s life (while also inspiring the names for her two Russian Blue cats). It was by chance that she went down the research path after unexpectedly losing her first job—teaching high school science. Faith later gave her the courage to begin an academic career at an institution (Carnegie Mellon University) that felt like the right fit, even when her Ph.D. in civil engineering could have led to the industrial job she originally planned to take. And chance and faith worked together to bring van Briesen to UMBC, where she took the position of Dean of the College of Engineering and Information Technology (COEIT) this summer. 

“I first visited UMBC about 15 years ago to give an invited talk, and I really enjoyed the visit,” she says. “The energy on campus, from the students to the faculty and staff, was exciting. I felt like, ‘I should be watching this place.’” 

So when the COEIT deanship opened at a time when van Briesen was ready to make her next career move, she once again felt two familiar forces guiding her. “I do feel like there was a little bit of chance involved in this move—the position opening up just as I was leaving the National Science Foundation and my youngest child was finishing his college journey. A little bit of chance and a little bit of faith brought me here. And, I’m loving it. It feels like home.”

As the campus welcomes new and returning students and faculty for the fall semester, van Briesen shares what she loves about higher ed and how excited she is to start the new school year.

Q: How did you decide on a career in academia? 

A: I started my career as a high school chemistry and physics teacher. I thought that was the most fun anybody could have. But after a year, I was laid off because the teacher I had been hired to replace decided unexpectedly to return. So I went to graduate school to get my master’s degree, and I fell in love with research. I loved doing research so much that I stayed to do my Ph.D. When I finished that, I was like, ‘Well, what job can I do where I can do both research and teaching?’ And that’s why I became a professor—because I could do both of the things I loved. And every day I get to engage with students and faculty about teaching and research, I know I made the right choice.

Q: Could you tell us more about your research?

A: My research focuses on water systems, both natural systems, like rivers and lakes and streams, and engineered systems, like drinking water and wastewater systems. I look at how reactions—whether biological, chemical, or geological—affect the transport and transformation of synthetic chemicals in these systems.

I also did a fair amount of work looking at microbial species: bacteria that we either don’t like because they make us sick, or bacteria that we do like because they can transform synthetic chemicals and clean up our environment. Over time, the work in my group changed the way we understand how interactions in natural systems affect interactions in engineered systems. For example, we would look at what’s changing in the river and then how those changes make it more difficult to treat the drinking water for people. 

Q: Which of your research findings do you feel has had the most impact so far?

A: Some research I was doing in southwestern Pennsylvania was related to the development of hydraulic fracturing for shale gas development in the region. There was a lot of discussion about whether shale gas development was using too much water or whether it was producing too much wastewater. And in a lot of ways, the answer was no, it wasn’t that different from other industries that used water and produced wastewater. Engineers have been managing those things for a long time to protect the environment while enabling energy production for people. 

But one thing that was different was that wastewater from gas development was being discharged into the environment with minimal treatment. The wastewater didn’t have many negative effects on the river. But in the drinking water plant, bromide from the wastewater interacted with naturally-occurring organic matter and the chlorine used to disinfect the water to produce brominated disinfection by-products. These chemicals are carcinogenic and teratogenic, and this can lead to negative health impacts when people use the treated water for drinking and bathing. 

The shale gas industry didn’t know that was going to happen, and the drinking water industry wasn’t expecting that outcome either. My research team’s systems-level work—looking at the whole river, including wastewater discharges and drinking water withdrawals—really changed the understanding that the region had about those impacts. It led to the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection working with the industry to stop those discharges.

So that was the work I did where I could look back and say, ‘I had an impact in my own community, for people in my hometown. My work saved lives.’

Q: What attracted you most to the COEIT deanship?

A: When I first visited UMBC, I was so impressed. The students were clearly engaged in their learning. The faculty were really committed to teaching and research, and that combination of research and teaching in higher ed is so important to me. And, the vision—to redefine excellence through an inclusive culture—that really resonated with me. 

The deanship was particularly attractive because of the opportunity to expand my impact. A lot of what faculty do is enable the success of students, and I love that role. And as a dean, you enable the success of everyone in the college—faculty, staff, students, and alumni. And so a dean role really takes that faculty role of enabling the success of others to the next level. 

Taking on any new role is a leap of faith. And, the chance to lead at UMBC felt worth it. 

Q: What have been your strongest impressions since arriving as dean?

A: The thing that’s struck me the most is that everyone’s really committed to the mission of UMBC. When people here talk about inclusive excellence, it’s not a catch phrase, it’s who we are fundamentally at the core of the institution. 

And the other thing is that everyone works really hard. Everyone’s invested in student success, and they’re always generating new ideas for how we can help students be successful. That’s very exciting.

Q: What do you love most about being an engineer? 

A: I like solving real problems for real people. I mean, I can get lost in the theoretical world, and I love deepening our fundamental understanding, but I always want to tie my research to some real problem, because that’s what engineering is. You don’t hear this often, but engineering and information technology are helping professions. 

The other thing I like about being an engineer is that I always feel like we’re needed. The world will always have increasingly complex and interconnected technical problems that have to be solved if we want people to flourish on the planet. The roles for engineers, computer scientists, and information technologists in different industries are always changing, and there are always more problems to solve. 

Q: And what do you love most about working in higher ed? 

A: Oh, the students, for sure. Every fall, you return to campus, and you get to meet new students. They’re excited to be here, and they bring energy and new ideas every year. They remind me how much I love learning because they love learning. They remind me why I became a teacher. Students arrive with wonderful potential, they grow while they’re here, and they go out into the world and do amazing things. UMBC exists to nurture that potential, help our students grow and learn, and to proudly look on as they change the world. 

Q: What are you most looking forward to in the coming year? 

A: Learning! I would probably give that answer every year because I am happiest when I’m learning. In this particular year, I’ve come to a new place and have a new job, so there will be even more learning fun. I’m going to be meeting students, staff, faculty, and alumni, not just from COEIT, but from everywhere at UMBC, and throughout Maryland and beyond. All of these meetings will help me understand who we are and what we aspire to be. That will help me fulfill my goal to enable success in my college, the university, and our communities. 

I am really excited to be here. Since arriving, I’ve learned so much from everyone I’ve met, and I’m looking forward to much more of that during this year.

Learn more about the College of Engineering and Information Technology.

The Conversation Weekly Podcast Interview with Meredith Oyen, Associate Professor of History and Asian Studies, UMBC.

With Russia’s Vladimir Putin and North Korea’s Kim Jong-Un among 26 world leaders watching, China’s president Xi Jinping made a muscular address to 50,000 people in Tiananmen Square marking 80 years since the end of the second world war. China is “never intimidated by bullies” and would “stand by the right side of history”, Xi said, adding that “the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation was unstoppable”.

Absent from the ceremony was Taiwan’s leader, Lai Ching-te, who instead took to Facebook, writing that Taiwan does not “commemorate peace with the barrel of a gun”. Taiwan had barred public officials from attending the event.

 China and Taiwan both claim their forces bore the true burden of Chinese resistance against Japan during the second world war, and use this contested history to lay claim to power and territory. Now China is weaponising this history, pushing for a “correct” perspective of the war as it seeks to reshape the world order and assert its ambitions over Taiwan.

In this episode of The Conversation Weekly podcast, Meredith Oyen, a historian and expert in China-Taiwan relations, explains how disagreements between China and Taiwan over who fought the Japanese more than 80 years ago are still raging and why China’s military parade raised tensions with Taiwan up another notch.

“The second world war has this very long shadow in all of east Asia because there’s a lot of unfinished business,” says Oyen, an associate professor of history and Asian studies at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County.

When Japan officially surrendered on September 9 at a ceremony in Nanjing, it was to the Republic of China, then ruled by Chiang Kai-shek. With the war against Japan over, Chiang’s nationalist Kuomintang resumed their civil war against the Chinese Communist Party. In 1949, Chiang and the Kuomintang were pushed to Taiwan as Mao Zedong declared the People’s Republic of China.

As a result, persistent questions about whether China and Taiwan are two separate entities or a divided nation with Taiwan a part of China are a “really significant geopolitical flashpoint” says Oyen, “something that stems directly out of the second world war”.

Listen to the conversation with Meredith Oyen about how disagreements between China and Taiwan over the second world war on The Conversation Weekly podcast. You can also read an text version of this interview.

This episode of The Conversation Weekly was written and produced by Mend Mariwany and Gemma Ware with assistance from Katie Flood. Mixing and sound design by Eloise Stevens and theme music by Neeta Sarl.

Newclips in this episode from Straits Times , BBC News and NBC News and KinoLibrary .

Listen to The Conversation Weekly via any of the apps listed above, download it directly via our RSS feed or find out how else to listen here. A transcript of this episode is available on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

Gemma Ware, Host, The Conversation Weekly Podcast, The Conversation

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article and see more than 300 UMBC articles available in The Conversation.

Written by Fred L. Pincus, emeritus professor of Sociology, UMBC.

Two big assumptions underlie President Donald Trump’s attack on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies. The first is that discrimination against people of color is a thing of the past. The second is that DEI policies and practices discriminate against white people – especially white men – in what’s sometimes called “reverse discrimination.”

I’m a sociologist who’s spent decades studying race and inequality, and when I read the documents and statements coming out of the Trump White House, these assumptions jump out at me again and again – usually implicitly, but always there.

The problem is that the evidence doesn’t back these assumptions up.

For one thing, if discrimination against white Americans were widespread, you might expect large numbers to report being treated unfairly. But polling data shows otherwise. A 2025 Pew survey found that 70% of white Americans think Black people face “some” or “a lot” of discrimination in general, and roughly two-thirds say the same of Asian and Hispanic people. Meanwhile, only 45% of white Americans believe that white people in general experience that degree of discrimination.

In other words, white Americans believe that people of color, as a group, face more discrimination than white people do. People of color agree – and so do Americans overall.

In a second national study, using data collected in 2023, Americans were asked if they had personally experienced discrimination within the past year. Thirty-eight percent of white people said they had, compared to 54% of Black Americans, 50% of Latinos and 42% of Asian Americans. In other words, white Americans are much less likely to say that they’ve been discriminated against than people of color.

The ‘hard’ numbers show persistent privilege

These statistics are sometimes called “soft” data because they reflect people’s perceptions rather than verified incidents. To broaden the picture, it’s worth looking at “hard” data on measures like income, education and employment outcomes. These indicators also suggest that white Americans as a group are advantaged relative to people of color.

For example, federal agencies have documented racial disparities in income for decades, with white Americans, as a group, generally outearning Black and Latino Americans. This is true even when you control for education. When the Census Bureau looked at median annual earnings for Americans between 25 and 64 with at least a bachelor’s degree, it found that Black Americans received only 81% of what comparably educated white Americans earned, while Latinos earned only 80%. Asian Americans, on the other hand, earned 119% of what white people earned.

These gaps persist even when you hold college major constant. In the highest-paying major, electrical engineering, Black Americans earned only 71% of what white people did, while Latinos earned just 73%. Asian Americans, in contrast, earned 104% of what white people earned. In the lowest-paid major, family and consumer sciences, African Americans earned 97% of what white people did, and Latinos earned 94%. Asian Americans earned 117% of what white people earned. The same general pattern of white income advantage existed in all majors with two exceptions: Black people earned more in elementary education and nursing.

Remember, this is comparing individuals with a bachelor’s degree or higher to people with the same college major. Again, white Americans are still advantaged in most career paths over Black Americans and Latinos.

Disparities persist in the job market

Unemployment data show similar patterns. The July 2025 figures for workers at all education levels show that Black people were 1.9 times more likely to be unemployed than white Americans. Latinos were 1.4 times more likely to be unemployed, and Asian Americans, 1.1 times.

This same white advantage still occurs when looking only at workers who have earned a bachelor’s degree or more. Black Americans who have earned bachelor’s degrees or higher were 1.3 times more likely to be unemployed than similarly educated white Americans as of 2021, the last year for which data is available. Latinos with college degrees were 1.4 times more likely to be unemployed than similar white Americans. The white advantage was even higher for those with only a high school degree or less. Unfortunately, data for Asian Americans weren’t available.

In another study, researchers sent 80,000 fake resumes in response to 10,000 job listings posted by 97 of the largest employers in the country. The credentials on the resumes were essentially the same, but the names signaled race: Some had Black-sounding names, like Lakisha or Leroy, while others had more “white-sounding” names like Todd or Allison. This method is known as an “audit study.”

This research, which was conducted between 2019 and 2021, found that employers were 9.5% more likely to contact the Todds and Allisons than the Lakishas and Leroys within 30 days of receiving a resume. Of the 28 audit studies that have been conducted since 1989, each one showed that applicants with Black- or Latino-sounding names were less likely to be contacted that those with white-sounding or racially neutral names.

Finally, a 2025 study analyzed 600,000 letters of recommendation for college-bound students who used the Common App form during the 2018-19 and 2019-20 academic years. Only students who applied to at least one selective college were included. The study found that letters for Black and Latino students were shorter and said less about their intellectual promise.

Similarly, letters in support of first-generation students – that is, whose parents hadn’t graduated from a four-year college, and who are disproportionately likely to be Black and Latino – had fewer sentences dedicated to their scientific, athletic and artistic abilities, or their overall academic potential.

These and other studies don’t provide evidence of massive anti-white discrimination. Although scattered cases of white people being discriminated against undoubtedly exist, the data suggest that white people are still advantaged relative to non-Asian people of color. White Americans may be less advantaged than they were, but they’re still advantaged.

While it’s true that many working-class white Americans are having a tough time in the current economy, it’s not because of their race. It’s because of their class. It’s because of automation and overseas outsourcing taking away good jobs. It’s because of high health care costs and cuts in the safety nets.

In other words, while many working-class white people are struggling now, there’s little evidence race is the problem.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article and see more than 300 UMBC articles available in The Conversation.

A glass knifefish darts back and forth in a short tube, its brain activity being recorded in real time. This small fish, alternating between swift bursts of sensing activity and slower, task-driven behaviors, is helping scientists understand how animals decide when to gather information about their environment versus act on it. A team of researchers is blending neuroscience, math, and engineering to decode these choices, with potential to guide robots in uncertain terrains or unlock secrets of the brain.

The team’s research has just been funded by the Collaborative Research in Computational Neuroscience (CRCNS) program—a joint initiative of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) that supports interdisciplinary research. Kathleen Hoffman, professor of mathematics and statistics, co-leads the grant.

The CRCNS program emphasizes collaborative efforts to advance understanding of nervous system functions through computational tools. With the lead investigator at Johns Hopkins University and additional collaborators at the New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT), and the University of Minnesota, the team for the newly funded project spans biology, engineering, mathematics, and computer science—a mix well-positioned to discover deeper insights into brain mechanisms.

‘Explore’ or ‘exploit’?

The new project builds on the same team’s prior research, published in 2023 in Nature Machine Intelligence, which revealed similar decision-making patterns across species, from amoebas to humans. In that work, the team analyzed the behavior of glass knifefish—weakly electric fish that navigate dark waters using self-generated electric fields—in experiments run by Noah Cowan, the lead investigator for the new grant. Then they compared their findings to the behavior of other species as described in the scientific literature, uncovering similar patterns in 11 species, including bats, mice, moths, and humans.

In the prior work, “We looked at velocity distributions, and we found that there were two modes of movement. We called them ‘explore’ and ‘exploit,’ but you could also describe them as ‘fast’ and ‘slow,’” Hoffman explains. During experiments in narrow tubes, the fish alternated between two modes: rapid, exploratory movements to sense their surroundings (“explore”) and slower, deliberate actions using the information they’d collected (“exploit”).

That research challenged robotics norms, showing that animals don’t constantly scan their environment, but rather burst into action when needed, a strategy the team showed is both more economical and more effective. The new project ramps up data collection—from 40 seconds per trial to 10 minutes—allowing the team to reveal subtler patterns, like burst lengths and correlations between the fish’s movement mode and its position in the tube.

Deciphering animal decisions

A primary goal is to uncover what prompts the mode switch. “How does it decide when to switch? And the hypothesis that we’re considering is that it’s based on some internal measure of uncertainty in the fish, meaning that if the fish isn’t sure if it’s inside the tube, it’s going to move so it can gather sensory information,” Hoffman says.

To test this, the team integrates several methods. At the University of Minnesota, engineers led by Andrew Lamperski will apply machine learning to map relationships between sensory inputs and behavioral outputs in the form of mathematical functions. Hoffman handles data analysis, starting with manual pattern-spotting before coding. 

“I can’t wait to get my hands on the data,” Hoffman says. She’ll start by simply printing out the velocity and position results and poring over them visually. “I don’t think there’s anything better than the human brain to see patterns, and mathematics is the study of patterns,” she adds. After observing what looks like a pattern, she’ll bounce her ideas off the rest of the team, and eventually “go write a program to automatically go through all the data and see if that pattern recurs.” 

A boon for the project comes from NJIT, where biologist Eric Fortune will record neural activity via electrodes inserted into the fish’s brains during the movement experiments—a technique unavailable in prior work. This will let the team compare brain signals with behavior in real time, and look for an underlying mechanism that drives the switch from “explore” to “exploit.”

A scientific ‘dream team’

This project’s power lies in its teamwork. Hoffman coordinates from UMBC, analyzing data from all the collaborators. Cowan oversees behavioral tests on fish without brain probes, which allows for more complex experimental setups. Fortune at NJIT is handling the neural recordings, while Lamperski at Minnesota focuses on machine learning models that reflect what the others are seeing in the lab.

“What I love about this project is that all the components are necessary to elucidate the mechanism,” Hoffman reflects. “Nobody could do this completely on their own.” 

“I’m excited to have this dream team of mathematicians, engineers, and neuroscientists to assemble behind this problem,” Cowan said. “My lab at Hopkins has struggled to make sense of these movements for over a decade. This new team puts us on a path to finally decode the neural mechanisms animals use to switch gears between gathering task information, on the one hand, and getting the task done, on the other.”

‘My favorite kind of science’

This research could eventually transform robotics.

“If you want to build a robot that is going to mimic the motion of animals that exhibit this explore/exploit pattern for incorporating sensory information, you have to know how the animals do it,” Hoffman says. “This grant is focused on figuring out what that mechanism is.”

A robot that mimics natural intermittent sensing might navigate uncertain spaces, like disaster zones, more efficiently than constant-scanning models. The shared explore-exploit pattern also suggests broader relevance for the research, potentially informing understanding of neurological disorders—though Hoffman stresses those possibilities are further down the road. 

The grant will also open doors for students: Hoffman plans to involve undergraduates in data visualization and analysis, offering hands-on experience in interdisciplinary research that demonstrates how together, diverse minds can unlock secrets of the brain—with ripple effects in tech and health.

“The one thing I’m really excited about in this grant is that it’s completely multidisciplinary,” Hoffman says. “Everybody has a different perspective that helps us understand what’s going on. This is my favorite kind of science.”

When Ivy Nguyen moved to the United States from Vietnam in 2014, her high school peers struggled to understand the British English she had grown up speaking. As she found herself “lost in British translation,” Nguyen decided to expand her skills across multiple English accents—Mid-Atlantic English, British English, and the accent with a mix of Vietnamese and English. From high school through college, these linguistic bridges provided Nguyen with opportunities for community building and leadership. Now, equipped with these strengths, she is headed to Taiwan to add Chinese to her language repertoire.

“Being able to listen without judgment is a critical skill,” says Nguyen, who double majored in Asian studies and global studies—adding Chinese, Korean, and a bit of Japanese—as well as some mileage in between with an education abroad experience at the Ewha Womans University in Seoul, Korea, during her junior year.

Since graduating in 2023, Nguyen has worked as a tutor at several public schools in Anne Arundel County, supporting students in first to ninth grade during the academic year, and served as a Generation Teach AmeriCorps Summer Teaching Fellow, a five-week K-8 STEAM academy, during the summer. “Two core values of Generation Teach are to foster belonging and to make sure everyone is included,” said Nguyen of her intensive training in identity, community building, content, and teaching. “We have students and teachers from all kinds of different backgrounds. I learned more about expressing myself without causing misunderstandings and how to convey my message while understanding the role that privilege plays in communication.” 

Nguyen’s language chops and ability to teach, lead, and uplift multiple communities earned her two prestigious international opportunities: First, as an alternate for the Fulbright U.S. Student Program award to Taiwan to pursue a master’s in Chinese as a second language; and the second is admission to the National Normal University, a leading institution in education and education research in Taipei, Taiwan, with funding from Taiwan’s Ministry of Education.

After completing over 350 hours of AmeriCorps service, Nguyen decided to forgo the alternate Fulbright spot and apply her hard-earned wisdom to pursue a master’s degree in teaching Chinese as a foreign language in Taiwan.

“When I was a kid coming to the United States, I was excited to get on a plane and move to a different country, but once I got here, I realized how different it was from what I thought it would be or sound like,” said Nguyen, who is already applying for a part-time job in Taiwan’s Ministry of Education English Language Teaching Assistant Program. “You have to know how to be flexible and pick what is right for you. If there is a change in plans, that’s still okay. Everything will be okay in the end.”

Learn more about UMBC’s Asian studies and global studies programs.

As the Baltimore Orioles gear up for the last months of the baseball season, the Baltimore Ravens are flexing their wings as the regular football season begins in September. For Baltimoreans, that means savoring their last bites of foot-long sausages at Camden Yards and getting ready for the Ravens’ tailgate parties at M&T Stadium.

For Dennis Coates, professor of economics, it is neither the beginning or ending of a season. As a sports economist, Coates lives and breathes sports 365 days a year. Sports economics is the study of everything that encompasses sports—player salaries, stadiums, major leagues, broadcasting and media rights—and how it all affects the fans and the larger economy. It’s that kind of passion that inspired him to organize the first sports economics conference at UMBC in 2024 and then again in 2025, and the reason why the North American Association of Sports Economists (NAASE) established an award in his and his long-time research partner, Brad R. Humphreys’ honor.

NAASE, of which Coates is a founding member, voted to establish the Coates-Humphreys NAASE Distinguished Research Award in honor of the decades of research and contributions Coates and Humphreys, the associate dean of academic affairs at the John Chambers College of Business and Economics at West Virginia University, have made to the field of sports economics. 

“NAASE’s executive committee is pleased to create this award to honor your distinguished scholarly records in sports economics, contributions to NAASE, including serving as presidents of the organization, extensive activities connecting NAASE to sports economics communities outside North America, and your service to the broader sports economics field,” wrote NAASE president E. Frank Stephenson, in the award letter. “The committee has also selected you as the inaugural winners.”

This year marks Coates’s 30th year teaching at UMBC and working with Humphreys, a former associate professor of economics at UMBC. Humphreys is currently a professor of economics at West Virginia University and associate dean of academic affairs and research. When Coates is not teaching Retrievers the ins and outs of sports economics, he edits the sports economics book series for Springer Publishing and serves as the editor of the Journal of Sports Economics. The journal publishes research in labor market research, labor-management relations, collective bargaining, wage determination, local public finance, and other fields related to the economics of sports. Humphreys is editor-in-chief of Contemporary Economic Policy, a general interest economics journal, and serves on the editorial boards of six sports economics research journals. In the last five years, Coates and Humphreys have co-authored six research papers ranging from topics on voting behavior in the NCAA, public policy toward professional sports stadiums, and the impact of professional sports stadiums on local economies.

“I was totally surprised by the creation of this award and that Brad and I were the first to receive it,” says Coates. “I am honored and humbled that my colleagues think so highly of me, my research, and my contribution to the discipline that they would create an award in my name.”

Learn more about UMBC’s economics department.

Now that the first week of classes is underway and you’re starting to find your new classrooms and make friends, you might be wondering how to make the most of this semester (whether it’s your first or last!) Faculty, staff, and students have chimed in to offer some advice for the year ahead, like embracing discomfort to help you grow, improving your financial literacy, and importantly, carving out your own ways to have fun.

Get money smart

Andrea Cipolla, director of financial aid and scholarships, explains how to get money smart while pursuing a degree: “Being financially responsible is an important aspect of the college experience. Make sure you utilize all the resources available to you. File your FASFA, participate in FinancialSmarts Cash Course to improve your financial awareness and skills, and file the Scholarship Retriever application every year.”

Take breaths and take charge

Ann Sofie Clemmensen, associate professor in dance and the Linehan Artist Scholars Program director, highlights the importance of taking a breath, just as much as taking charge: “Do not hesitate to ask your professor, a teaching assistant, academic advisor, or a classmate for help, whether that is asking for clarification on an assignment or advice. In college, you cannot take a passive role, so I encourage every student to take charge of their academic trajectory.” She also wants to remind students that, “Inhalation is the source of inspiration, the exhale is the work that follows… so remember to take in deep breaths. Make sure you carve out time and space to breathe.”

Clemmensen calls attention to a quote by the American filmmaker, David Lynch: “Ideas are like fish. If you want to catch little fish, you can stay in the shallow water. But if you want to catch the big fish, you’ve got to go deeper. Down deep, the fish are more powerful and more pure.” She explains that, “as a student, I encourage you to check in with yourself to see if you are primarily swimming in shallow water. If so, find the courage and motivation to explore further out.”

Use the resources available

Senior dance major, Madison Kayser, offers her resourceful advice as a transfer student to fellow Retrievers: “Really invest time into using resources and events provided to you by the school. I know it seems pointless, but trust me it makes or breaks your experience in college.”

Find the people who motivate you

“Be open minded and explore” is the core of what Tamya Davis, senior psychology and social work double major, wants to remind her fellow students.

“There is a lot to do and experience so trying new things, whether it’s a class or a food, can be really fun. Campus also has a lot happening always so go to different events, different clubs, etc. Never be afraid of being uncomfortable; it just means you have an opportunity to grow.”

Tamya also highlights the importance of having fun; “The people you meet on campus will definitely make your experience better since you are building community and a support system. As cliché as it sounds, it really helps to have people around you to motivate you and share your passion.”

Kayla Logue ’27 is a 2025 UCM intern and Linehan Scholar who is majoring in dance.

Menstrual health can be a financial burden that many people quietly carry. On average, menstruating people spend $20 a month on period products, a total of around $18,000 in their lifetime. When I first started attending UMBC, on campus, like most places, I noticed that products aren’t freely accessible in bathrooms, leaving many students struggling to meet basic needs. But I would quickly learn, from my classes and my student work position, that at UMBC, you’re never “just a student,” but also a person who can create change.

That realization first took shape in the spring of 2023, during my freshman year. I was taking Dr. Kate Drabinski’s gender and women’s studies class on feminist activism, in which I worked with a group to advocate for free menstrual health products on campus. Looking for guidance, I reached out to the Women’s, Gender, and Equity Center (WGEC). But what started as a class project turned into a deeper connection with the WGEC, ultimately leading me to apply for a student intern position that would last for four semesters.

Pushing past imposter syndrome

​When I began working at the WGEC, my initial assumption was that my role would primarily involve routine administrative tasks, such as managing the front desk, greeting visitors, and answering phone calls. Instead, as I became more immersed in the role, I was given the space to take on responsibilities that extended beyond administrative duties and required deeper involvement, such as facilitating a discussion group for women of color. After taking on these important tasks, I began to feel a sense of imposter syndrome—I felt unqualified to meet the expectations. Still, I pushed myself to take on the responsibilities of the job.

For the two years I worked there, my supervisors, Lauren Allen, director, and Zoe Brown, program coordinator, consistently encouraged me to go out of my comfort zone and grow both personally and professionally. I picked up skills on public speaking from the various activities the WGEC is involved in—from presenting my research on intersectional feminism at URCAD, to hosting panels, workshops, and discussion circles.

Working at the WGEC also allowed me to put my passion for social justice to use. Such as planning and engaging in the Take Back the Night (TBTN) rally to support survivors of sexual violence and raise awareness on campus. Despite the difficulties of navigating imposter syndrome, UMBC gave me many opportunities to make real change as “just a student worker.”

The skills I developed through working at the WGEC gave me the confidence and abilities to pursue other avenues—another step in learning to elevate my student voice. In March of 2024, I was a participant in the Alternative Spring Break (ASB) trip through the Center for Democracy and Civic Life. Again, I had the opportunity to advocate for causes I was passionate about, in this case, specifically focusing on the incarceration system and improving life after incarceration. The lessons I learned during that five-day trip were invaluable.

I was so impassioned by this experience that I applied to become a leader for next year’s cohort of ASB participants. This time, the group focused on environmental justice and sustainability efforts in Baltimore City. We met with community leaders, organizations, city officials, and local communities directly impacted by the issues.

Discovering my self-reliance

Participating in these opportunities through the WGEC and the Center for Democracy and Civic Life instilled the belief that I could pursue significant endeavors. As a first-year student, I thought of UMBC as just another educational institution. Through participating in campus initiatives, I came to discover that UMBC is a community of change-makers, from our administration, to our faculty and staff, to the students. We’re always pushed to think outside the box and question everything we think we already know.

Taking on leadership roles while being supported by the WGEC has allowed me to transform self-doubt into self-reliance, something I didn’t pick up on until college. I drew confidence from trusting that my supervisors and peers recognized strengths in me that I hadn’t fully seen, which reinforced my belief in my own potential.

Although my project advocating for free menstrual products has yet to come to fruition, the work continues. Through other student groups, SGA committees, and proposals, I have hope that this vision will be realized. In the meantime, the WGEC has many free resources available.

My advice to fellow Retrievers is, get involved. It’s never too late to explore all the opportunities available at UMBC. Always remember that the connections you make and the lessons you learn here will stay with you long after your academic journey is over. Get engaged, ask the big questions, push yourself to achieve your goals, and influence the world. The UMBC community will be right there with you along your journey.

Learn more about UMBC’s Center for Democracy and Civic Life, and the Women’s, Gender, & Equity Center.

Tanzila Malik is a senior majoring in women’s studies and a 2025 UCM intern. 

As the fall 2025 semester takes off at UMBC, the campus hums with the energy of our largest-ever incoming class, reflecting a Retriever spirit that draws talent from near and far. With total undergraduate enrollment rising 2.6 percent, this fall UMBC welcomed 2,280 first-time, first-year students and over 870 new transfer students. In addition, an increased first-year retention rate shows UMBC’s supportive environment helps students thrive and stay the course toward their goals.

“We are thrilled to welcome another record-breaking first-year class,” shares Yvette Mozie-Ross ’88, vice provost for enrollment management and planning. “What excites us most is this year’s geographically diverse student body, with more international, out-of-state, and Baltimore City undergraduates, fostering a vibrant campus community.”

Diving into community

Welcome, Retrievers kicked off on August 23 with the excitement of move-in day, where family, friends, faculty, and staff helped Retrievers settle into their home away from home. As new arrivals hauled storage bins, they bonded with roommates and volunteers through laughter and shared anticipation. Commuting students connected with each other at Commuter Welcome Day. 

Among the many activities that set the stage for the year ahead, Involvement Fest drew hundreds of students. Filling the Retriever Activities Center, more than 200 student organizations invited students to join academic clubs, sports, Greek life, service groups, and more. These activities give all students the chance to explore their interests and find new ones while developing lasting friendships. 

“I’m looking forward to meeting new people and also spending time with my friends,” shared Annamarie Walther, a senior financial economics major, at Involvement Fest. As the communications lead for the Catholic Retrievers, “I’m excited to serve,” she added. 

An institution where you belong

A few days earlier at UMBC’s Fall Opening Meeting, first-year student Andrew Whipple shared that attending college was never a given for him. “Being here at UMBC is about more than just academics,” Whipple, a visual arts major and a Linehan Artist Scholar, shared. “It’s about breaking barriers and creating a future for myself that I can be proud of.”

Archana Thakkar, an incoming transfer student pursuing a degree in business technology administration, also shared hopes held by many students. “I am excited to join UMBC and become part of a community that thrives on collaboration and innovation. I look forward to building connections with professors and classmates, engaging in student organizations, and taking part in opportunities that encourage both personal and academic growth,” Thakkar says. “More than anything, I am eager to contribute to the vibrant spirit of UMBC while learning from the diverse perspectives that make this university so special.” 

At Convocation, UMBC President Valerie Sheares Ashby officially ushered in the start of a new school year. She shared an uplifting message with students, faculty, and staff, promising all would be supported as they pursued their potential. “I want you to know that you have come to an institution that wants you here and that is sure that you belong and that you can be successful,” she said, “even if you are not so sure yourself yet.” 

After Convocation, attendees spilled out of the Chesapeake Employers Insurance Arena and toward a lively cookout on the Quad. As conversation and lemonade flowed, strangers began to turn into friends, setting the tone for a year of achievement among community.