<?xml version="1.0"?>
<News page="5913" pageCount="10543" pageSize="10" timestamp="Mon, 06 Apr 2026 09:22:31 -0400" url="https://dev.my.umbc.edu/posts.xml?page=5913">
  <NewsItem contentIssues="false" id="106398" important="false" url="https://dev.my.umbc.edu/posts/106398">
    <Title>Hacking the Real World: Donor support gives students hands-on experience in their fields</Title>
    <Body>
      <![CDATA[
          <div class="html-content">This spring, more than 350 students joined in this year’s annual HackUMBC, a 24-hour “tech innovation marathon” where participants were …</div>
      ]]>
    </Body>
    <Summary>This spring, more than 350 students joined in this year’s annual HackUMBC, a 24-hour “tech innovation marathon” where participants were …</Summary>
    <Website>https://magazine.umbc.edu/hacking-the-real-world-donor-support-gives-students-hands-on-experience-in-their-fields/</Website>
    <TrackingUrl>https://dev.my.umbc.edu/api/v0/pixel/news/106398/guest@my.umbc.edu/1355b995ace31902b141a36f1a0ffd28/api/pixel</TrackingUrl>
    <Tag>alumni</Tag>
    <Tag>celestine-wong</Tag>
    <Tag>coeit</Tag>
    <Tag>dan-hood</Tag>
    <Tag>hackumbc</Tag>
    <Tag>impact</Tag>
    <Tag>michael-bishoff</Tag>
    <Tag>nsa</Tag>
    <Tag>scholarships</Tag>
    <Tag>tenable-network-security</Tag>
    <Group token="umbc-magazine">UMBC Magazine</Group>
    <GroupUrl>https://dev.my.umbc.edu/groups/umbc-magazine</GroupUrl>
    <AvatarUrl>https://assets4-dev.my.umbc.edu/images/avatars/group/5/xsmall.png?1775246734</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="original">https://assets2-dev.my.umbc.edu/images/avatars/group/5/original.png?1775246734</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="xxlarge">https://assets3-dev.my.umbc.edu/images/avatars/group/5/xxlarge.png?1775246734</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="xlarge">https://assets4-dev.my.umbc.edu/images/avatars/group/5/xlarge.png?1775246734</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="large">https://assets4-dev.my.umbc.edu/images/avatars/group/5/large.png?1775246734</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="medium">https://assets1-dev.my.umbc.edu/images/avatars/group/5/medium.png?1775246734</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="small">https://assets3-dev.my.umbc.edu/images/avatars/group/5/small.png?1775246734</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="xsmall">https://assets4-dev.my.umbc.edu/images/avatars/group/5/xsmall.png?1775246734</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="xxsmall">https://assets3-dev.my.umbc.edu/images/avatars/group/5/xxsmall.png?1775246734</AvatarUrl>
    <Sponsor>UMBC Magazine</Sponsor>
    <PawCount>0</PawCount>
    <CommentCount>0</CommentCount>
    <CommentsAllowed>false</CommentsAllowed>
    <PostedAt>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 11:49:05 -0400</PostedAt>
  </NewsItem>
  <NewsItem contentIssues="true" id="61185" important="false" url="https://dev.my.umbc.edu/posts/61185">
    <Title>Volunteers Needed -- Air &amp; Space Museum's STEM Heritage Day</Title>
    <Body>
      <![CDATA[
          <div class="html-content"><div><span><span><span>Saturday, August 6, 2016 from 9am - 3:30 pm</span></span> at the Air &amp; Space Museum in Chantilly, VA</span> </div><div>	 </div><div><span>Volunteer for STEM Family Day event and enjoy this amazing museum of spacecraft and aircraft. Volunteers facilitate easy electrical circuits and network with other SWE members at the SWE table. Many shifts available. <span>If you have questions, feel free to contact Kate McGuire at </span></span><a rel="nofollow external" class="bo"><span>kate_m_mcguire@ymail.com</span></a><span><span>. </span></span> </div><div><span>Register at: </span><a href="http://www.baltwashswe.org/event-2279811%20" rel="nofollow external" class="bo"><span><u>http://www.baltwashswe.</u>org/event-2279811</span></a> </div></div>
      ]]>
    </Body>
    <Summary>Saturday, August 6, 2016 from 9am - 3:30 pm at the Air &amp; Space Museum in Chantilly, VA       Volunteer for STEM Family Day event and enjoy this amazing museum of spacecraft and aircraft....</Summary>
    <TrackingUrl>https://dev.my.umbc.edu/api/v0/pixel/news/61185/guest@my.umbc.edu/eee86a7d7f8f6518d0100ab996db5a14/api/pixel</TrackingUrl>
    <Group token="swe">Society of Women Engineers</Group>
    <GroupUrl>https://dev.my.umbc.edu/groups/swe</GroupUrl>
    <AvatarUrl>https://assets2-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/000/179/29093d10b0c57f776c78f839d0203739/xsmall.png?1441121952</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="original">https://assets3-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/000/179/29093d10b0c57f776c78f839d0203739/original.jpg?1441121952</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="xxlarge">https://assets3-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/000/179/29093d10b0c57f776c78f839d0203739/xxlarge.png?1441121952</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="xlarge">https://assets1-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/000/179/29093d10b0c57f776c78f839d0203739/xlarge.png?1441121952</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="large">https://assets3-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/000/179/29093d10b0c57f776c78f839d0203739/large.png?1441121952</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="medium">https://assets1-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/000/179/29093d10b0c57f776c78f839d0203739/medium.png?1441121952</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="small">https://assets2-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/000/179/29093d10b0c57f776c78f839d0203739/small.png?1441121952</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="xsmall">https://assets2-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/000/179/29093d10b0c57f776c78f839d0203739/xsmall.png?1441121952</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="xxsmall">https://assets1-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/000/179/29093d10b0c57f776c78f839d0203739/xxsmall.png?1441121952</AvatarUrl>
    <Sponsor>UMBC Society of Women Engineers (SWE)</Sponsor>
    <ThumbnailUrl size="xxlarge">https://assets3-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/thumbnails/news/000/061/185/7d4016b8d7efbb7e42a20197d3d5417d/xxlarge.jpg?1469547659</ThumbnailUrl>
    <ThumbnailUrl size="xlarge">https://assets2-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/thumbnails/news/000/061/185/7d4016b8d7efbb7e42a20197d3d5417d/xlarge.jpg?1469547659</ThumbnailUrl>
    <ThumbnailUrl size="large">https://assets4-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/thumbnails/news/000/061/185/7d4016b8d7efbb7e42a20197d3d5417d/large.jpg?1469547659</ThumbnailUrl>
    <ThumbnailUrl size="medium">https://assets2-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/thumbnails/news/000/061/185/7d4016b8d7efbb7e42a20197d3d5417d/medium.jpg?1469547659</ThumbnailUrl>
    <ThumbnailUrl size="small">https://assets3-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/thumbnails/news/000/061/185/7d4016b8d7efbb7e42a20197d3d5417d/small.jpg?1469547659</ThumbnailUrl>
    <ThumbnailUrl size="xsmall">https://assets2-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/thumbnails/news/000/061/185/7d4016b8d7efbb7e42a20197d3d5417d/xsmall.jpg?1469547659</ThumbnailUrl>
    <ThumbnailUrl size="xxsmall">https://assets2-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/thumbnails/news/000/061/185/7d4016b8d7efbb7e42a20197d3d5417d/xxsmall.jpg?1469547659</ThumbnailUrl>
    <PawCount>4</PawCount>
    <CommentCount>0</CommentCount>
    <CommentsAllowed>true</CommentsAllowed>
    <PostedAt>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 11:42:49 -0400</PostedAt>
    <EditAt>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 11:52:27 -0400</EditAt>
  </NewsItem>
  <NewsItem contentIssues="false" id="61184" important="false" url="https://dev.my.umbc.edu/posts/61184">
  <Title>Looking For Roommate</Title>
  <Tagline>3 bed apt, 20 minutes away, $600/month (includes utilities)</Tagline>
  <Body>
    <![CDATA[
    <div class="html-content">I am looking for a roommate to share a 3 bed, 1.5 bath apartment.  The apartment is 20 minutes away from campus in Laurel.  It is in a quiet community with a great neighborhood, and easy access to major highways.  To see the community yourself, here is the website: <a href="http://www.homesteadatlaurel.com" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">www.homesteadatlaurel.com</a><div><br></div><div>To live here, you need to be rather independent, and yes you will need a car.  Also, those who want their own place to throw parties should NOT respond.  Girls are preferred, but boys comfortable living with girls are welcome.  The rent, including all utility fees, will be no more than $600 / month.  Move in date would be August 12th.  If you are interested, or have any questions, please shoot an email to <a href="mailto:ncrone1@umbc.edu">ncrone1@umbc.edu</a></div></div>
]]>
  </Body>
  <Summary>I am looking for a roommate to share a 3 bed, 1.5 bath apartment.  The apartment is 20 minutes away from campus in Laurel.  It is in a quiet community with a great neighborhood, and easy access to...</Summary>
  <TrackingUrl>https://dev.my.umbc.edu/api/v0/pixel/news/61184/guest@my.umbc.edu/dffcba48245803786ebee8fedeccca86/api/pixel</TrackingUrl>
  <Group token="classifieds">Classifieds</Group>
  <GroupUrl>https://dev.my.umbc.edu/groups/classifieds</GroupUrl>
  <AvatarUrl>https://assets4-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/081/27816fed47150f6fda5f96e75013749f/xsmall.png?1434550723</AvatarUrl>
  <AvatarUrl size="original">https://assets2-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/081/27816fed47150f6fda5f96e75013749f/original.png?1434550723</AvatarUrl>
  <AvatarUrl size="xxlarge">https://assets1-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/081/27816fed47150f6fda5f96e75013749f/xxlarge.png?1434550723</AvatarUrl>
  <AvatarUrl size="xlarge">https://assets1-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/081/27816fed47150f6fda5f96e75013749f/xlarge.png?1434550723</AvatarUrl>
  <AvatarUrl size="large">https://assets3-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/081/27816fed47150f6fda5f96e75013749f/large.png?1434550723</AvatarUrl>
  <AvatarUrl size="medium">https://assets3-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/081/27816fed47150f6fda5f96e75013749f/medium.png?1434550723</AvatarUrl>
  <AvatarUrl size="small">https://assets3-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/081/27816fed47150f6fda5f96e75013749f/small.png?1434550723</AvatarUrl>
  <AvatarUrl size="xsmall">https://assets4-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/081/27816fed47150f6fda5f96e75013749f/xsmall.png?1434550723</AvatarUrl>
  <AvatarUrl size="xxsmall">https://assets3-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/081/27816fed47150f6fda5f96e75013749f/xxsmall.png?1434550723</AvatarUrl>
  <Sponsor>Classifieds</Sponsor>
  <PawCount>0</PawCount>
  <CommentCount>0</CommentCount>
  <CommentsAllowed>true</CommentsAllowed>
  <PostedAt>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 11:33:22 -0400</PostedAt>
  <EditAt>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 11:34:46 -0400</EditAt>
</NewsItem>
  <NewsItem contentIssues="true" id="61183" important="false" url="https://dev.my.umbc.edu/posts/61183">
  <Title>Help make Patapsco Trail Fest a success!</Title>
  <Body>
    <![CDATA[
    <div class="html-content"><div><span>Looking for fun ways to do some volunteer hours, consider preparing Patapsco State Park for </span><span>Patapsco Trail Fest </span><span>in September and the Patapsco Valley 50k in October. </span></div><div><span><br></span></div><div><span>The next trail work day is this Sunday (7/31) at 9am at Shelter 708.  The group </span><span>will be working on a connection from the top to the bottom in the</span></div><div><p></p><p>Pickall Area. Race Pace Bicycles is providing lunch and beverages. </p><p> </p><p>Patapsco Valley State Park - Pickall Area - 8125 Johnnycake Road Woodlawn MD 21244 - Pavilion 708, take the fifth right after crossing over I-70 and follow to the end - GPS 39.301591, -76.782062</p><p><br></p><p>For more information, please contact <span>Mario Raymond</span><span> at </span><span><a href="mailto:mraymond@wchdc.com">mraymond@wchdc.com</a> and visit these website: </span></p><p><span><br></span></p><p><a href="http://patapsco50k.com/" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">http://patapsco50k.com/</a></p><p> </p><p><a href="http://pvsptrailfest.com/" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">http://pvsptrailfest.com/</a></p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.facebook.com/patapscovalley50k/" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">https://www.facebook.com/patapscovalley50k/</a></p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.facebook.com/Patapsco-Trail-Fest-773896902738168/" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">https://www.facebook.com/Patapsco-Trail-Fest-773896902738168/</a><span> </span></p></div><div><br></div><span>(**This is not a UMBC event)</span></div>
]]>
  </Body>
  <Summary>Looking for fun ways to do some volunteer hours, consider preparing Patapsco State Park for Patapsco Trail Fest in September and the Patapsco Valley 50k in October.      The next trail work day is...</Summary>
  <Website>https://pvsptrailfest.com</Website>
  <TrackingUrl>https://dev.my.umbc.edu/api/v0/pixel/news/61183/guest@my.umbc.edu/cc22cd0f2bbc9543784934200c8dfb2b/api/pixel</TrackingUrl>
  <Group token="retired-271">UMBC Community Engagement Network</Group>
  <GroupUrl>https://dev.my.umbc.edu/groups/retired-271</GroupUrl>
  <AvatarUrl>https://assets1-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/000/271/4ef352d82c0b3506a0df2ed486d44b17/xsmall.png?1498142039</AvatarUrl>
  <AvatarUrl size="original">https://assets4-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/000/271/4ef352d82c0b3506a0df2ed486d44b17/original.JPG?1498142039</AvatarUrl>
  <AvatarUrl size="xxlarge">https://assets4-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/000/271/4ef352d82c0b3506a0df2ed486d44b17/xxlarge.png?1498142039</AvatarUrl>
  <AvatarUrl size="xlarge">https://assets3-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/000/271/4ef352d82c0b3506a0df2ed486d44b17/xlarge.png?1498142039</AvatarUrl>
  <AvatarUrl size="large">https://assets1-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/000/271/4ef352d82c0b3506a0df2ed486d44b17/large.png?1498142039</AvatarUrl>
  <AvatarUrl size="medium">https://assets2-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/000/271/4ef352d82c0b3506a0df2ed486d44b17/medium.png?1498142039</AvatarUrl>
  <AvatarUrl size="small">https://assets2-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/000/271/4ef352d82c0b3506a0df2ed486d44b17/small.png?1498142039</AvatarUrl>
  <AvatarUrl size="xsmall">https://assets1-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/000/271/4ef352d82c0b3506a0df2ed486d44b17/xsmall.png?1498142039</AvatarUrl>
  <AvatarUrl size="xxsmall">https://assets4-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/000/271/4ef352d82c0b3506a0df2ed486d44b17/xxsmall.png?1498142039</AvatarUrl>
  <Sponsor>UMBC Serves</Sponsor>
  <ThumbnailUrl size="xxlarge">https://assets4-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/thumbnails/news/000/061/183/b71ecc3677e6825a62dbda1fe8ca0ca5/xxlarge.jpg?1469546394</ThumbnailUrl>
  <ThumbnailUrl size="xlarge">https://assets1-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/thumbnails/news/000/061/183/b71ecc3677e6825a62dbda1fe8ca0ca5/xlarge.jpg?1469546394</ThumbnailUrl>
  <ThumbnailUrl size="large">https://assets3-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/thumbnails/news/000/061/183/b71ecc3677e6825a62dbda1fe8ca0ca5/large.jpg?1469546394</ThumbnailUrl>
  <ThumbnailUrl size="medium">https://assets3-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/thumbnails/news/000/061/183/b71ecc3677e6825a62dbda1fe8ca0ca5/medium.jpg?1469546394</ThumbnailUrl>
  <ThumbnailUrl size="small">https://assets1-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/thumbnails/news/000/061/183/b71ecc3677e6825a62dbda1fe8ca0ca5/small.jpg?1469546394</ThumbnailUrl>
  <ThumbnailUrl size="xsmall">https://assets1-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/thumbnails/news/000/061/183/b71ecc3677e6825a62dbda1fe8ca0ca5/xsmall.jpg?1469546394</ThumbnailUrl>
  <ThumbnailUrl size="xxsmall">https://assets2-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/thumbnails/news/000/061/183/b71ecc3677e6825a62dbda1fe8ca0ca5/xxsmall.jpg?1469546394</ThumbnailUrl>
  <PawCount>1</PawCount>
  <CommentCount>0</CommentCount>
  <CommentsAllowed>true</CommentsAllowed>
  <PostedAt>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 11:20:35 -0400</PostedAt>
  <EditAt>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 11:21:41 -0400</EditAt>
</NewsItem>
  <NewsItem contentIssues="false" id="108622" important="false" url="https://dev.my.umbc.edu/posts/108622">
    <Title>Alum Paul Tschirgi releases new mobile game Deliverance</Title>
    <Body>
      <![CDATA[
          <div class="html-content">Three years in the making, the mobile game Deliverance by Paul Tschirgi ’15, visual arts, is now available for download on the App Store and Google Play. In this satirical game, players need to deliver fresh pizza to save the world from fake food, which requires excellent weaponry and driving skills to fend off world destruction.</div>
      ]]>
    </Body>
    <Summary>Three years in the making, the mobile game Deliverance by Paul Tschirgi ’15, visual arts, is now available for download on the App Store and Google Play. In this satirical game, players need to...</Summary>
    <Website>https://news.umbc.edu/alum-paul-tschirigi-releases-new-mobile-game-deliverance/</Website>
    <TrackingUrl>https://dev.my.umbc.edu/api/v0/pixel/news/108622/guest@my.umbc.edu/a34384a27cd7ea4501df3f393fdc72a0/api/pixel</TrackingUrl>
    <Tag>alumni</Tag>
    <Tag>arts-and-culture</Tag>
    <Tag>cahss</Tag>
    <Tag>visualarts</Tag>
    <Group token="umbc-news">UMBC News</Group>
    <GroupUrl>https://dev.my.umbc.edu/groups/umbc-news</GroupUrl>
    <AvatarUrl>https://assets2-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/944/2c79aeea85b1abb37f8cf9fbcdc382b0/xsmall.png?1632921809</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="original">https://assets4-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/944/2c79aeea85b1abb37f8cf9fbcdc382b0/original.png?1632921809</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="xxlarge">https://assets4-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/944/2c79aeea85b1abb37f8cf9fbcdc382b0/xxlarge.png?1632921809</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="xlarge">https://assets1-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/944/2c79aeea85b1abb37f8cf9fbcdc382b0/xlarge.png?1632921809</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="large">https://assets1-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/944/2c79aeea85b1abb37f8cf9fbcdc382b0/large.png?1632921809</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="medium">https://assets1-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/944/2c79aeea85b1abb37f8cf9fbcdc382b0/medium.png?1632921809</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="small">https://assets4-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/944/2c79aeea85b1abb37f8cf9fbcdc382b0/small.png?1632921809</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="xsmall">https://assets2-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/944/2c79aeea85b1abb37f8cf9fbcdc382b0/xsmall.png?1632921809</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="xxsmall">https://assets4-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/944/2c79aeea85b1abb37f8cf9fbcdc382b0/xxsmall.png?1632921809</AvatarUrl>
    <Sponsor>UMBC News</Sponsor>
    <PawCount>0</PawCount>
    <CommentCount>0</CommentCount>
    <CommentsAllowed>false</CommentsAllowed>
    <PostedAt>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 08:33:48 -0400</PostedAt>
  </NewsItem>
  <NewsItem contentIssues="false" id="61182" important="false" url="https://dev.my.umbc.edu/posts/61182">
  <Title>Anthropogenic Global Warming: a Myth of Scientific Consensus</Title>
  <Tagline>A Gentle Introduction to Unqualified Reservations</Tagline>
  <Body>
    <![CDATA[
    <div class="html-content"><blockquote><span>From Unqualified Reservations:<br><br>"AGW: <span>anthropogenic global warming<br><br></span></span></blockquote>There
     is no surprise behind this acronym.  You probably already have an 
    opinion about AGW.  If it's the right opinion, please feel free to skip 
    this section.<br><br>Adopting the pejorative tone we are shortly to 
    encounter, and reflecting it in the opposite direction, we can call a 
    believer in the organized scientific consensus behind AGW an AGW <span>credulist</span>.  An unbeliever, of course, is an AGW <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/about.php" rel="nofollow external" class="bo"><span>denialist</span></a>.<br><br>You'll
     notice - this is a property of each of today's cases - that there is a 
    vast intellectual gap between the credulists and the denialists.  There 
    is no moderate position on AGW. You believe, or you don't believe.  One 
    of the two sides is extremely right, and the other is extremely wrong.  I
     like using pejorative terms for both, because one will turn out to be 
    hip and ironic, and the other will turn out to be richly deserved.<br><br>As the page behind that link so helpfully explains:<br><blockquote><span>Almost
     every denialist argument will eventually devolve into a conspiracy. 
    This is because denialist theories that oppose well-established science 
    eventually need to assert deception on the part of their opponents to 
    explain things like why every reputable scientist, journal, and opponent
     seems to be able to operate from the same page. In the crank mind, it 
    isn't because their opponents are operating from the same set of facts, 
    it's that all their opponents are liars (or fools) who are using the 
    same false set of information.</span><br><br><span>But
     how could it be possible, for instance, for nearly every scientist in a
     field be working together to promote a falsehood? People who believe 
    this is possible simply have no practical understanding of how science 
    works as a discipline.</span></blockquote>A fabulous question.  We'll 
    answer it in a moment.  But for now, keep the suspense.  Dear reader, if
     you are comfortable with this tone, I suggest you read the entire post 
    linked above.   It has lots of good information about denialists, 
    cranks, and other enemies of science.<br><br>If something strikes you as
     not quite right about the Hoofnagels' tone, good.  That means your head
     is screwed on right.  However, as part of the procedure, we'll need to 
    expose you to an even more extreme example of it.<br><br>Warning: this may increase your heart rate.  Warning two: please don't click through <a href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/01/05/anthony-watts-up-with-that-anti-science-denier-website-weblog-awards/" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">this link</a> to the blog <span>Climate Progress</span>, provided solely for reference purposes.  Warning three: yes, the author of the words below  is (as we'll see) an influential man of real public authority.<br><blockquote><span>Diagnosing a victim of anti-science syndrome (ASS)</span><br><br><span>In
     this post I’m going to present the general diagnosis for “anti-science 
    syndrome” (ASS). Like most syndromes, ASS is a collection of symptoms 
    that individually may not be serious, but taken together can be quite 
    dangerous — at least it can be dangerous to the health and well-being of
     humanity if enough people actually believe the victims.</span><br><br><span>One
     tell-tale symptom of ASS is that a website or a writer focuses their 
    climate attacks on non-scientists. If that non-scientist is Al Gore, 
    this symptom alone may be definitive.</span><br><br><span>The
     other key symptoms involve the repetition of long-debunked denier 
    talking points, commonly without links to supporting material. Such 
    repetition, which can border on the pathological, is a clear warning 
    sign.</span><br><br><span>Scientists who 
    kept restating and republishing things that had been widely debunked in 
    the scientific literature for many, many years would quickly be 
    diagnosed with ASS. Such people on the web are apparently heroes — at 
    least to the right wing and/or easily duped (see “The Deniers are 
    winning, but only with the GOP“).</span><br><br><span>If you suspect someone of ASS, look for the repeated use of the following phrases:</span> [...]<span><br><br></span><span>Individually,
     some of these words and phrases are quite useful and indeed are 
    commonly used by both scientists and non-scientists who are not 
    anti-science. But the use of more than half of these in a single speech 
    or article is pretty much a definitive diagnosis of ASS.</span><br><br><span>When
     someone repeats virtually all of those phrases, along with multiple 
    references to Al Gore, they are wholly a victim of ASS — in scientific 
    circles they are referred to as ASS-wholes.</span><br><br><span>A newly prominent ASS-whole is Harold Ambler, who managed to get this article past a HuffingtonPost intern over the weekend: “<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/harold-ambler/mr-gore-apology-accepted_b_154982.html" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">Mr. Gore: Apology Accepted.</a>”
     I was not originally planning to post on this (unsourced) collection of
     long debunked denier talking points since, as regular readers know, my 
    policy is not to waste time on the umpteenth debunking. Anyone who might
     be persuaded by Ambler’s tripe can do a simple search for each myth on 
    RealClimate or on this blog. [...]<br><br>As deniers or ASS-wholes go, 
    Ambler is quite lame. Separate from his long list of long-debunked 
    denier talking points, who could possibly take seriously somebody who 
    wrote the following:</span><br><blockquote>Mr. Gore has stated, 
    regarding climate change, that “the science is in.” Well, he is 
    absolutely right about that, except for one tiny thing. It is the 
    biggest whopper ever sold to the public in the history of humankind.</blockquote><span>Such
     a statement is anti-scientific and anti-science in the most extreme 
    sense. It accuses the scientific community broadly defined of deliberate
     fraud – and not just the community of climate scientists, but the 
    leading National Academies of Science around the world (including ours) 
    and the American Geophysical Union, an organization of geophysicists 
    that consists of more than 45,000 members and the American 
    Meteorological Association and the American Association for the 
    Advancement of Science (see “<a href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/01/29/yet-more-scientists-call-for-deep-ghg-cuts/" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">Yet more scientists call for deep GHG cuts</a>“).<br><br>Such
     a statement accuses all of the member governments of the IPCC, 
    including ours, of participating in that fraud, since they all sign off 
    on the Assessment Reports word for word (see “<a href="http://climateprogress.org/2007/11/17/must-read-ipcc-synthesis-report-debate-over-delay-fatal-action-not-costly/" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">Absolute MUST Read IPCC Report: Debate over, further delay fatal, action not costly</a>“).
     And, of course, Ambler’s statement accuses all of the leading 
    scientific journals of being in on this fraud, since the IPCC reports 
    are primarily a review and synthesis of the published scientific 
    literature.<br></span></blockquote>Now, as Loyalists, what do you hear 
    when you hear this tone?  I know what I hear.  What I hear is Samuel 
    Adams, James Otis, Jr., and Joseph Hawley.  The distinctive whining 
    scream of the Puritan, speaking power to truth as is his usual fashion. 
     Recognizable in any century.<br><br>Follow those last two links above, 
    if you dare.  Or don't bother.  What we see quickly is that, at least as
     regards AGW, we live in what might be called a <span>scientific theocracy</span>.  You cannot slip a sheet of paper between Science and State.  They are one and the same.  Especially with our new, improved, <a href="http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/12/20/obamas-message-on-science/?ref=science" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">pro-science administration</a>, the only legitimate source of public policy on AGW happens to be... <span>the very scientists who research it</span>.  (<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/jan/18/jim-hansen-obama" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">Professor Hansen</a> is a fine example.)<br><br>Note
     that, if we substitute Science for Scripture, this is exactly the 
    political structure of your Puritan theocracy, or your Persian theocracy
     for that matter.  The same experts perform the intellectual analysis 
    and dictate the resulting policies.  Simple, clean, no muss, no fuss.<br><br>Of
     course, there is a considerable difference between Science and 
    Scripture.  And what, exactly, is that difference?  We shall see in a 
    moment.  More suspense.<br><br>As always for the historian and general student of reality, the first question becomes: <span>do we trust these people?</span>
      It is possible that Science is such powerful juju that untrustworthy 
    people, so long as they are Scientists, can be trusted.  On the other 
    hand, we would certainly want some support for this claim.  And it can't
     hurt to start with an assessment of individual credibility.<br><br>Normally,
     when we're deciding whether to trust (say) Peter Oliver versus John 
    Adams, we have only their words to go on.  Dear reader, I invite you to 
    test your critical faculties on the effusion above.  Does it strike you 
    as trustworthy?  But fortunately, we are operating not in the past but 
    in the present, and not in the domain of history but that of geophysics.
      We have more to go on.<br><br>The author of <span>Climate Progress</span> is one Joseph Romm.  Who is Joseph Romm?  His <a href="http://climateprogress.org/about" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">about box</a> explains:<br><blockquote>Joseph
     Romm is the editor of Climate Progress. Joe is a Senior Fellow at the 
    Center for American Progress and was acting assistant secretary of 
    energy for energy efficiency and renewable energy during the Clinton 
    Administration. In December 2008, Romm was elected a Fellow of the 
    American Association for the Advancement of Science for “distinguished 
    service toward a sustainable energy future and for persuasive discourse 
    on why citizens, corporations, and governments should adopt sustainable 
    technologies.” <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_J._Romm" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">Read what Wikipedia has to say about Joe</a>.</blockquote>(Do read what Wikipedia has to say about Joe.  It has a distinctly, um, self-edited flavor.)<br><br>Here's the problem, AGW credulists.  The problem is: <span>I know Joe Romm</span>.  And I know, without a doubt, that he is a <span>foul creature of the night</span>.  Sadly, I cannot share this deep truth through direct osmosis, but we will arrive at it by and by.<br><br>Okay,
     I don't know Joe Romm.  But my mother knows Joe Romm - to be more 
    exact, she worked for him at DoE - and I trust my mother.  Here is her 
    recollection:<br><blockquote>Oh, yes.  Romm was one of three who loaded 
    me with work for my first few months with Energy Efficiency and 
    Renewable Energy.  He was Deputy Assistant Secretary, and ran the show 
    with Christine Ervin (Assistant Secretary) and Brian Castelli. Christine
     finally got two inches from my face and announced that I was supposed 
    to be working for her alone.  Romm promulgated the idea that he was the 
    smartest person to ever enter <a href="http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?fuseaction=LABELED_BUILDINGS.showProfile&amp;profile_id=1005028" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">Forrestal</a>.
      He used to regularly win the Washington Post contests for creating the
     best caption for captionless cartoons.  Maybe that was it.  At any 
    rate, he got annoyed with me the time three of us went up to the Hill to
     one of the staffers on an authorization committee trying to gain turf. 
     I was supposed to be carrying budget analysis to help, but there had 
    been little time to prepare. The meeting was a disaster (the staffer 
    being a lot smarter than Romm), and in the taxi back I had to listen to 
    him blaming me for getting the numbers wrong (I can't even remember 
    whether they were).  Shortly afterwards I was assigned a windowless 
    office during a general office move and had plenty of time on my hands. 
     By the way, he once borrowed from me your copy of Easterbrook's <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Moment-Earth-Coming-Environmental-Optimism/dp/0140154515" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">A Moment on the Earth</a>, apparently in order to disparage the "opposition."</blockquote>What
     does this tell you?  Not a lot.  It is just a snapshot of the world Joe
     Romm lives in.  Notice, however, that my mother's snapshot of Joe 
    Romm's world does not, in any way, resemble the image of Joe Romm's 
    world that you get from Joe Romm's blog.<br><br>Basically, my mother got
     involved with this world by accident.  More or less everyone else in 
    EERE was there because they were true believers.  My mother was there 
    because her kids had gone to college, and she needed a job.  So she 
    wound up as a budget and policy analyst, working for the true believers.<br><br>This
     drove my mother up the wall.  She is basically an honest person.  She 
    does not have the skill sets to work effectively as a member of a 
    criminal organization, and she certainly did not expect the United 
    States Department of Energy to be anything of the sort.<br><br>Yes: that's exactly what I said.  Joe Romm should be in <span>prison</span>.  James Hansen should be in <span>prison</span>.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Mann_%28scientist%29" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">Michael Mann</a> should be in <span>prison</span> (and not for making <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0113277/" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">Heat</a>).  These people are <span>criminals</span>.  Sadly, no one will be arresting any of them any time soon.<br><br>What my mother found at EERE was a sort of giant, Potomac-shaped hog-trough, dispensing a billion or two a year to grunting <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beltway_bandits" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">Beltway bandits</a> packed shoulder-to-shoulder around a vast open sewer of hot, juicy, delicious cash.  This is, of course, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_triangle" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">iron triangle</a>
     of Washington fame.  (I think the triangle should include at the very 
    least the press, making it a square, which would let us add <a href="http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">Andrew Revkin</a>
     to our fantasy arrest list.  All you coup plotters out there, listen 
    up.  These guys are all buddies - you can probably nab all four at the 
    same Super Bowl party.)<br><br>In order to keep said open sewer open, 
    EERE planners (such as my mother) had to go through the following 
    process: they had to analyze a constant flow of scientific and 
    engineering information from the renewable-energy researchers they 
    supported (typically experienced recipients of such grants, which is why
     they call them "Beltway bandits"), decide which technologies seemed 
    promising and which did not, support the former and cut the latter.<br><br>Now:
     my mother was at DOE in the mid-90s.  How many successful 
    renewable-energy technologies can you name that came out of DOE in the 
    mid-90s?  Or came out of anywhere in the mid-90s?  Or came out of 
    anywhere at all?  What are the successes of renewable energy?<br><br>For
     that matter, even today, how many press releases have you seen 
    reprinted in your newspaper of choice, promising that renewable-energy 
    technology X - algae biofuel, perhaps, or Stirling engines, or thin-film
     solar-panels; the list is endless - would hit the market a year from 
    now, two years from now, five years from now?  For how many years have 
    you been seeing these types of announcements?  How many renewable-energy
     technologies have hit said market?<br><br>The reason, of course, is 
    that most of these technologies simply don't work.  At least, not in the
     sense of being even remotely cost-effective.  Of course, one can still 
    tinker with them, and one never knows how tinkering will turn out.  But 
    what would happen at EERE, over and over again, is that some research 
    program would promise result X by year Y, fail, add 1 to Y, and get more
     money for next year.<br><br>My mother's job was not to evaluate renewable-energy technologies.  It was to <span>pretend</span>
     to evaluate renewable-energy technologies - creating the essential 
    illusion of science-driven public policy.  Since everyone involved in 
    this process understood that it was a farce, you can imagine the quality
     of the data.  Meanwhile, as usual in Washington, how much money you got
     depended on how many friends in the right places you had.  This tends 
    not to change from year to year, resulting in remarkably consistent 
    budget allocations.<br><br>In other words, my mother's work was <span>bullshit</span>
     in the best Frankfurtian sense.  Some might get a kick out of this, but
     she is just not the type. And at the time, AGW was not the big thing it
     is now.  So the open sewer seemed picayune.  A billion here, a billion 
    there.  It sounds big to the hoi-polloi, but of course it isn't.  What 
    was not obvious in the late '90s is that, if you can steal billions, you
     can steal trillions.  And that <span>is</span> a big deal.<br><br>But
     I am just describing the perspective from which I, personally, arrived 
    at AGW.  You don't know me, my mother, or Joe Romm.  So we'll need to 
    actually consider the science - or Science, as the case may be.<br><br>But first, I want to praise Joe Romm.  Because, unlike the paladins of light in this department (foremost, of course, the great <a href="http://www.climateaudit.org/" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">Steve McIntyre</a> - note the difference in tone), Joe Romm <span>knows what's at stake</span>.  Read this again:<br><blockquote><span>Such
     a statement is anti-scientific and anti-science in the most extreme 
    sense. It accuses the scientific community broadly defined of deliberate
     fraud – and not just the community of climate scientists, but the 
    leading National Academies of Science around the world (including ours) 
    and the American Geophysical Union, an organization of geophysicists 
    that consists of more than 45,000 members and the American 
    Meteorological Association and the American Association for the 
    Advancement of Science.<br><br>Such a statement accuses all of the member governments of the IPCC, including ours, of participating in that fraud...<br></span></blockquote>Exactly.<br><br>And
     it's very interesting that we hear this from the AGW credulists, rather
     than the denialists.  Your average AGW denialist does not want to go 
    there.  He wants the problem to be isolated.  The last thing he wants is
     for <span>the scientific community broadly defined,</span> or even worse <span>all the member governments of the IPCC</span>, to appear in his crosshairs.  (For example, McIntyre, probably quite wisely, snips all political discussion in his comments.)<br><br>For UR, the matter is just the opposite.  We <span>already suspect</span>
     that these governments are Orwellian and corrupt.  After all, once 
    you're a Loyalist, the question is settled by definition.  So we are 
    happy to hear Joe Romm's description of the stakes.  For once, he is 
    exactly right.<br><br>Again, the problem is boolean.  There is no continuum, only two perspectives.<br><br>From
     the viewpoint of the AGW credulist, AGW is a critically serious 
    problem, perhaps even an emergency; AGW research is essential spending; 
    public concern about AGW is a sign of prudent, educated citizenship; and
     the public-policy measures recommended by AGW researchers, such as 
    carbon controls, are a matter of national importance.<br><br>Let's 
    consider, for a moment, the amazing position of the AGW credulist - not 
    the researchers and the bureaucrats, just the ordinary schmoe who is 
    asked to believe in this stuff.  The credulist is seriously, deeply, 
    personally concerned at a political level about <span>the concentration of gases in Earth's atmosphere</span>.<br><br>My favorite introduction to American history is <a href="http://www.historians.org/info/AHA_History/cfadams.htm" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">this 1901 essay</a> by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Francis_Adams,_Jr." rel="nofollow external" class="bo">Charles Francis Adams, Jr.</a>,
     in which our historian examines the controversial issues in every 
    Presidential election from 1856 to 1900, lamenting somewhat over their 
    general detachment from reality.  I suspect that Adams, despite his 
    obvious sang-froid, would be truly amazed by the appearance of 
    atmospheric chemistry in the American political mind.<br><br>But this 
    proves nothing.  As promised, we need to consider the matter from 
    scratch.  What is the Loyalist position on AGW?  What we've established 
    is that it walks like Puritan hysteria, it talks like Puritan hysteria, 
    and it smells like the Devil himself.  But we are better than that.  
    We'd like to actually evaluate the matter.<br><br>What, exactly, is AGW?  What is science?  And what is the relationship between the two?<br><br>AGW is the result of an effect described by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svante_Arrhenius#Greenhouse_effect" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">Arrhenius</a>
     in the late 19th century, in which CO2 in the atmosphere reflects 
    outgoing infrared radiation back at the earth.  There is no dispute as 
    to the existence of this effect, or <a href="http://scrippsco2.ucsd.edu/program_history/keeling_curve_lessons.html" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">the increasing levels of CO2</a> in Earth's atmosphere, or the fact that this trend is produced by people burning fossil fuels.<br><br>Important facts to remember are (a) that the temperature increase is proportional not to the CO2 level but to its <span>logarithm</span>
     (this is undisputed, but I have never, ever seen an AGW credulist 
    mention it directly), meaning that each doubling of CO2 produces a 
    constant increase in total radiation; (b) that at present rates of 
    fossil fuel use, CO2 will be double its present value by <a href="http://brneurosci.org/co2.html" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">2255</a>
     (of course, fossil fuel use could increase, which would bring this 
    number in - let's pull a round figure out of our asses, and call it 
    2100); and (c) that doubling CO2 increases total radiation by roughly <a href="http://www.sciencebits.com/OnClimateSensitivity" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">3.8 W/m^2</a> over the present value of 1366 W/m^2, or about 0.3%.<br><br>And how much temperature increase will this cause?  The answer to this question is called the <a href="http://www.sciencebits.com/OnClimateSensitivity" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">climate sensitivity</a>
     - the function that maps an increase in incoming radiation to an 
    increase in atmospheric temperature.  (The link is to a denialist site, 
    but there is no argument over the concept.)  What is the best scientific
     estimate of Earth's climate sensitivity?<br><br>Let's postpone this question for a moment.  It requires us to define <span>science</span>.  Or <span>Science</span>.<br><br>Here,
     sadly, we must part from Joe Romm.  His definition of Science is clear.
      Science is that which is done by scientists.  Scientists are people 
    employed, with the title of professor, by the universities.  The 
    universities are accredited by Washington.  Therefore, Science, in Joe 
    Romm's mind, can be defined as <span>official truth</span>.  Let's stick with the capital letter for this one.<br><br>Note
     that if we replace Science with Scripture and scientists with 
    ministers, we are back in the Massachusetts Bay Colony.  We've reduced 
    the scientific method to the following statement: <span>Washington is always right</span>.  But surely not even the sage who gave us "ASS-whole" is crass enough to endorse this principle.<br><br>The conventional explanation of why <span>science</span>, with miniscule s, works so well, is due to Karl Popper and his concept of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">falsifiability</a>.
      Whole forests have been cut down over this issue, but here at UR we 
    have a very simple interpretation of falsifiability, which we'll now 
    share.<br><br>The unusual trustworthiness of <span>science,</span>
     despite the fact that scientists are humans and humans are not 
    generally trustworthy, exists when (a) hypotheses are falsifiable, and 
    (b) the professional institutions within which scientists operate 
    promote, broadcast, and reward any falsification.  We can trust a 
    consensus of scientists on a problem for which (a) and (b) are true, 
    because we are basing our trust on the fact that, if the hypothesis is 
    false, a large number of very smart people has tried and failed to 
    discover its error.  This is not, of course, impossible.  But it is at 
    least unlikely.<br><br>So we have two definitions, and our $64,000 question: is <span>Science</span> <span>science</span>?
      That is: is the official truth of AGW, which claims the high 
    credibility produced by Popperian falsifiability in a functioning system
     of critical feedback, in fact justified in claiming this credibility?<br><br>The answer is easy: <span>no</span>.<br><br>To
     understand the impact of increased CO2, we need to know the climate 
    sensitivity.  Q: how can scientists, at least Popperian scientists, 
    evaluate the climate sensitivity?  A: they can't.  There is no 
    falsifiable procedure which can estimate climate sensitivity.<br><br>To 
    estimate climate sensitivity, all you need is an accurate model of 
    Earth's atmosphere.  Likewise, to get to Alpha Centauri, all you have to
     do is jump very high.  The difference between the computing power we 
    have, and the computing power we would need in order to accurately model
     Earth's atmosphere, is comparable to the difference between my vertical
     leap and the distance to Alpha Centauri.  For all practical purposes, 
    climate modeling is the equivalent of earthquake prediction: an 
    unsolvable problem.<br><br>If you want to see this argument laid out in detail, read <a href="http://www.skeptic.com/the_magazine/featured_articles/v14n01_climate_of_belief.html" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">Pat Frank's article in Skeptic</a>.
      To my mind, all this detail about error bars simply obfuscates the 
    fact of an unsolvable problem.  The GCMs that purport to simulate 
    climate are interesting experiments, and it's not unimpressive that they
     can be made to produce results that look at least reasonable.  But they
     model the atmosphere with grid cells 100 miles on a side, and attempt 
    to use this to predict the state of the atmosphere - a chaotic system - 
    for the next century.  This does not pass the laugh test.<br><br>There 
    is simply no scientific way to verify or falsify the accuracy of any 
    such piece of software.  It is not practical to perturb Earth's climate,
     perturb your model's climate, and test that they both respond in the 
    same way.  And there is no other way to test a model.  In the end, all 
    you have is a curve that records past temperature, and a piece of 
    software that generates future temperature.  Perhaps if we could watch 
    the predicted and actual curves match up for a century or so, we could 
    generate something like statistical significance.  But we can't.  And 
    hindcasting - fitting the models to data from the past - <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overfitting" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">overfits</a>, and is completely worthless.<br><br>There
     are two fields of Science which contribute to the AGW conclusion: 
    climate modeling and paleoclimatology.  Michael Mann pioneered the 
    construction of "hockey stick" graphs which appear to show 
    "unprecedented" increases in temperature in the late 20th century.  Even
     supposing that Mann was not a charlatan (see below), these curves would
     have no scientific meaning whatsoever.<br><br>It is fairly clear that 
    Earth's temperature has been increasing over the last few centuries, and
     that in the 20th century it rose from 1900 through the '30s, fell from 
    the '30s through the '70s, rose from the '70s through the '90s, and has 
    been flat since the '90s.  What would it have done in the absence of 
    increasing CO2?  Again, we have no way to know.  We have no model.  We 
    cannot separate the curves.  (<a href="http://www.iarc.uaf.edu/highlights/2007/akasofu_3_07/Earth_recovering_from_LIA.pdf" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">This paper</a> [large PDF] by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syun-Ichi_Akasofu" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">Syun-Ichi Akasofu</a> makes the point quite elegantly.)<br><br>Besides
     the fraud, what's creepy about the hockey stick is that it implicitly 
    argues causality by mere visual analogy.  We see increasing temperature 
    and increasing CO2, so the two must be related.  WTF?  This is not the 
    kind of argument that appeals to a scientist.  It is the kind of 
    argument that appeals to a voter.<br><br>What we are looking at here, I think, is what Feynman called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cargo_cult_science" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">cargo-cult science</a>.  GCMs and paleoclimatology look - to your average voter - like <span>science</span>
     with a small s.  They perform huge numbers of intricate calculations, 
    they collect vast quantities of data, and of course they are <span>Science</span>
     with a big S.  It's just that their efforts have no falsifiable 
    predictive value.  And what is much worse, they claim predictive value 
    and are driving policy off it.<br><br>The justified arrogance of 
    falsifiable science is such that, when science goes bad, it goes 
    extremely bad.  Langmuir's description of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pathological_science" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">pathological science</a>
     is worth reading.  Note that GCMs fit this profile quite well - they 
    produce results where there should be only noise.   However, it is not 
    at all necessary to resort to erudite mathematical abstractions to catch
     these people in a lie.  The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mens_rea" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">mens rea</a> is easy to find.<br><br>If you have any remaining doubt in the matter, <a href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/22/should-you-believe-anything-john-christy-or-roy-spencer-say/" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">here</a>
     is one of Joe Romm's posts in which, as usual, he accuses his opponents
     of being lying Trotskyist wreckers.  In this post we see the following 
    statement:<br><blockquote>But I find it hilarious that the deniers and 
    delayers still quote Christy/Spencer/UAH analysis lovingly, but to this 
    day dismiss the “hockey stick” and anything Michael Mann writes, when 
    his analysis was in fact vindicated by the august National Academy of 
    Sciences in 2006.<br></blockquote>What is Romm talking about?  To understand the issue, read <a href="http://www.uoguelph.ca/%7Ermckitri/research/McKitrick-hockeystick.pdf" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">this</a> [PDF], then <a href="http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2322" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">this</a>.  You'll see that the word "vindicated" is - um - <span>extremely</span>
     unjustified.  For those tempted to defend Romm on the grounds that he 
    is a mere bureaucrat and doesn't know better, note that he has a Ph.D in
     physics from MIT.  As I said: <span>prison</span>.<br><br>So:
     not only is the research behind AGW not falsifiable science, and thus 
    not entitled to deference regardless of the personal trustworthiness of 
    its promoters, its promoters are - in fact - snakes.  It never rains but
     it pours.  In fact, if you read Climate Audit on a regular basis, you 
    see examples of gross scientific misconduct that would be career-ending 
    in any legitimate field, perhaps once or twice a month.  Mann's 
    (repeated) statistical manipulation is especially egregious, but not at 
    all unusual.<br><br>We also have (one) answer to the first question of 
    the AGW credulists: how a scientific consensus can produce a fraudulent 
    result.  The answer is simple: the <span>entire field</span>
     is fraudulent.  In a fraudulent pseudoscience, there is no incentive at
     all for uncovering error, because the only result of a successful 
    dissent is to destroy your job and those of your peers.<br><br>We can see this effect in the experience of climate modeler <a href="http://curry.eas.gatech.edu/" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">Judith Curry</a>, who to her great credit dealt with McIntyre the way a real scientist would: inviting him to give a talk.  She <a href="http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2697#comment-208815" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">wrote</a>:<br><blockquote>I
     am taking some heat for all this from my peers outside Georgia Tech. 
    The climate blog police were very upset by my congratulations to Steve 
    upon winning the best science blog award. A recent seminar speaker was 
    appalled to be included in the same seminar series as steve and pat, and
     told me i was misleading my students. I got some support for what I am 
    doing from a program manager at NSF who I spoke with recently, who 
    appreciated my "missionary work" over at climate audit. Another NSF 
    program manager is apparently not at all happy about this. Some people 
    think that my participation over here in someway "legitimizes" CA; my 
    participation over here is not all that relevant in the overall scheme 
    of CA. I am fully aware that many of my peers think i am crazy for doing
     this.</blockquote>Cargo-cult scientists have to circle the wagons like 
    this.  If they piss off the NSF program managers, their life expectancy 
    as successful grantwinners is not impressive.  Real scientists have no 
    such need to be defensive, because their program managers actually <span>want</span> them to expose any errors in their field.<br><br>Thus
     we answer the initial Hoofnagel question: the source of coordinated 
    error is not, at all, a conspiracy.  It is simply the funding source.<span>  Nearly every scientist in a field </span>can be<span> working together to promote a falsehood</span>
     because they all get their money from Joe Romm and company.  And if the
     falsehood is exposed rather than promoted, there is no field left.  It 
    is no more surprising that all USG-funded scientists are unanimous in 
    promoting AGW as a global emergency, than that all Philip Morris-funded 
    scientists are unanimous in promoting tobacco as a vitamin.<br><br>What we're looking at here is <span>mainstream pathological science</span>.  This is a basic and unfixable flaw in the entire <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vannevar_Bush" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">Vannevar Bush</a>
     design for federally-funded science.  Once cranks, quacks, or 
    charlatans get a foothold in the NSF and/or the universities, and 
    establish their quack field as a legitimate department of Science, they 
    are there to stay.<br><br>The mainstream cranks will not expel 
    themselves, and there is no mechanism by which another department can 
    attack them.  In theory they are vulnerable to the democratic political 
    system (or, at least, the Republican political system), and as we've 
    seen they play up this fear quite a bit.  In practice, of course, they 
    did quite a bit more damage to Bush than he did to him.<br><br>The 
    incentive of all federally-funded science is the same: keep your 
    funding, and try to get more.  It is not that most scientists are "in it
     for the money."  It is that you cannot be a successful scientist, in 
    this era, without being a successful bureaucrat.  As such you respond to
     bureaucratic incentives, such as the feelings of your NSF program 
    manager.<br><br>And we start to see how this entire disaster developed. 
     First: out of genuine curiosity, people started trying to build climate
     models, measure CO2, and the like.  Second: since USG is not a charity,
     they had to apply for grants and describe the importance of their work.
      Third: they noticed, consciously or subconsciously, that an easy way 
    to make their work seem more important was to predict disastrous 
    consequences.  Fourth: the same evolutionary feedback process that, in a
     falsifiable science, eradicates error, operated to promote it.  
    Researchers and fields which produced more alarming results received 
    more funding - because, by definition, their work was more important.  
    Iterate to the point of sheer insanity, and you have the AGW research 
    community we have today.<br><br>There remains one loophole by which AGW 
    credulists may defend their position.  They can say (although they 
    don't) that, even though there is no scientific way to estimate climate 
    sensitivity, the fact that we are poking Earth's climate with a stick 
    and we have no knowledge of its effect is itself egregious.  This is the
     famous <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precautionary_principle" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">precautionary principle</a>.<br><br>Note
     that now we have completely abandoned the pretense of scientific public
     policy.  This is excellent, because it allows us to think <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phronesis" rel="nofollow external" class="bo"><span>phronetically</span></a> - using the ordinary tools of common sense - about whether CO2-triggered warming is, or is not, a genuine problem.<br><br>Here
     is a thought-experiment that will resolve this easily for you.  In a 
    world with no fossil fuels and a stable CO2 level, scientists studying 
    the sun announce that they have (never mind how) scientifically 
    determined that its intensity will increase by 0.3% between now and 
    2100.  You are Dictator of Earth.  How do you react to this information?<br><br>Do
     you (a) do nothing at all; (b) keep an eye on the problem, treating it 
    as of roughly the same significance of, say, the possibility of a Sri 
    Lankan tea blight; or (c) immediately embark on a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoengineering" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">geoengineering scheme</a> to counterbalance the brightening sun and keep Earth cool?<br><br>Recall from <a href="http://www.sciencebits.com/OnClimateSensitivity" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">Shaviv's math</a>
     that, if we ignore feedbacks and treat Earth as a black body, the 
    expected climate sensitivity is about 1 degree Celsius.  Perhaps this is
     in the rough neighborhood of the actual result, and perhaps it isn't.  
    We also need to consider the most obvious effect of global warming, 
    sea-level rise.  The sea is rising at about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">two millimeters per year</a>.<br><br>First,
     realize how thoroughly un-terrifying these figures are.  Even if you 
    triple them.  If, as Dictator of Earth, your worst problem is oceans 
    that will rise a foot in a century, or air that will become three 
    degrees warmer, you simply don't have much of a problem.  What ever 
    happened to the Nazis?  Perhaps aliens could invade?  Being Dictator of 
    Earth has to be more challenging than this.  If your subjects can't 
    handle oceans that rise by a half-centimeter a year, perhaps you need to
     focus on breeding more intelligent subjects.<br><br>Our trick here was 
    to replace the "artificial" increase of CO2 with a "natural" brightening
     of the sun.  These have identical effects on the Earth, and identical 
    consequences for its residents.  But only one has a narrative of guilt 
    and redemption.  What we see is that the results, stripped of their 
    Puritan moral baggage, are just not all that terrifying.  
    Environmentalists often play this game; in the classic Jesuitical 
    fashion of the good old black regiment, they will talk guilt and 
    redemption to those who want to hear guilt and redemption, and practical
     consequences to those more receptive to reality.  The guilt and 
    redemption are drivel; the practical consequences, as we see when we 
    look at them on their own, are just not that serious.<br><br>Worse, we 
    can even question the proposition that the human consequences of a mild 
    warming are negative.  For most of the 20th century, students of global 
    climate made a simple assumption: warmer was better.  We can see this in
     the names that previous generations of scientists applied to past warm 
    periods, such as the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocene_climatic_optimum" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">Holocene Optimum</a> and the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_Warm_Period" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">Medieval Optimum</a>.
      "Optimum" does not mean "worse."  To the researchers who invented 
    these names, it was just obvious that a warmer climate meant warmer 
    temperate regions, a more fertile Earth, and more human prosperity.  
    This perception, reached without thought of controversy by serious 
    researchers in the 20th century, is a genuine consensus that deserves 
    our respect.<br><br>But in the age of AGW, there is no professional 
    incentive for researchers to study the positive effects of warming 
    climate, and a tremendous incentive for them to study the <a href="http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/2045/" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">negative effects</a>.
      Of course, if you only look at the research rather than the incentives
     which produce it, you will come away with the conclusion that warming's
     negative effects vastly outnumber its positive ones.  (Indeed, in the 
    age of Puritan environmentalism, we can barely even express the thought 
    that a human alteration to the environment might be in some sense 
    benign.)<br><br>Again, we see both scientific and public opinion 
    changing not to follow the truth, but to follow the funding.  The entire
     AGW industry is thus best explained as an intellectual pathology of the
     20th century's disastrous decision to convert disorganized, 
    decentralized, and unofficial science into organized, centralized and 
    official science.<br><br>This gives us our policy prescription: end <span>all</span>
     official funding of science, especially in cases in which the output of
     the science drives public policy.  If a government to rely on the 
    advice of scientists, it must make sure that it is relying on actual, 
    falsifiable science, and that the institutions producing that science 
    have no incentive to produce anything other than the truth.  The obvious
     way to do this is to separate science and state, for the health of 
    both.<br><br>In a healthy society, people would still study the Earth's 
    climate.  They might even try to model it.  But they would do so for the
     original motivation of science: <span>curiosity</span>.  Today, bright young people go into the environmental sciences because they offer quite a different attraction: <span>power</span>.  The sense of status and importance held by a James Hansen, or even a Joe Romm, is hard for such as you or me to even imagine.<br><br>A
     key aspect of this is not merely that the AGW researchers, their 
    proteges, and their little academic empires survive and grow, but that 
    their advice is taken by the State - and, as a result, has what many 
    people in the trade call <span>impact</span>.
      Of course this is just a name for power, and those who have it find it
     so pleasant that they are seldom inclined to consider whether they are 
    using it for good or for evil.<br><br>If you surf from Climate Progress to Climate Audit, the change from the world of <span>funding</span> and <span>impact</span>
     to the world of skepticism and curiosity is unmistakable and infinitely
     refreshing.  The former is an NGO, supported by nameless and sinister 
    fat cats.  The latter has a tip jar.  'Nuff said.  Someday, all of 
    science will return to the attitude and methodology of a Steve McIntyre,
     and its Washingtonian captivity will seem like no more than a bad 
    dream."<br><br><a href="http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2009/01/gentle-introduction-to-unqualified_22.html" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2009/01/gentle-introduction-to-unqualified_22.html</a><br></div>
]]>
  </Body>
  <Summary>From Unqualified Reservations:  "AGW: anthropogenic global warming   There  is no surprise behind this acronym.  You probably already have an  opinion about AGW.  If it's the right opinion, please...</Summary>
  <TrackingUrl>https://dev.my.umbc.edu/api/v0/pixel/news/61182/guest@my.umbc.edu/98dd35949afdfe54ff2888b1b20a8b9a/api/pixel</TrackingUrl>
  <Group token="current-events">Current Events</Group>
  <GroupUrl>https://dev.my.umbc.edu/groups/current-events</GroupUrl>
  <AvatarUrl>https://assets4-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/082/76cb2624c9d093d029a3a43ae55148f1/xsmall.png?1434551082</AvatarUrl>
  <AvatarUrl size="original">https://assets1-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/082/76cb2624c9d093d029a3a43ae55148f1/original.png?1434551082</AvatarUrl>
  <AvatarUrl size="xxlarge">https://assets2-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/082/76cb2624c9d093d029a3a43ae55148f1/xxlarge.png?1434551082</AvatarUrl>
  <AvatarUrl size="xlarge">https://assets4-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/082/76cb2624c9d093d029a3a43ae55148f1/xlarge.png?1434551082</AvatarUrl>
  <AvatarUrl size="large">https://assets3-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/082/76cb2624c9d093d029a3a43ae55148f1/large.png?1434551082</AvatarUrl>
  <AvatarUrl size="medium">https://assets4-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/082/76cb2624c9d093d029a3a43ae55148f1/medium.png?1434551082</AvatarUrl>
  <AvatarUrl size="small">https://assets4-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/082/76cb2624c9d093d029a3a43ae55148f1/small.png?1434551082</AvatarUrl>
  <AvatarUrl size="xsmall">https://assets4-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/082/76cb2624c9d093d029a3a43ae55148f1/xsmall.png?1434551082</AvatarUrl>
  <AvatarUrl size="xxsmall">https://assets3-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/082/76cb2624c9d093d029a3a43ae55148f1/xxsmall.png?1434551082</AvatarUrl>
  <Sponsor>Current Events</Sponsor>
  <PawCount>3</PawCount>
  <CommentCount>9</CommentCount>
  <CommentsAllowed>true</CommentsAllowed>
  <PostedAt>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 08:22:48 -0400</PostedAt>
  <EditAt>Sun, 18 Dec 2016 16:02:05 -0500</EditAt>
</NewsItem>
  <NewsItem contentIssues="false" id="61180" important="false" url="https://dev.my.umbc.edu/posts/61180">
    <Title>Room Available August 1st</Title>
    <Body>
      <![CDATA[
          <div class="html-content">Our house is located on Poplar Avenue, walking distance of UMBC. We have a room open for $500 plus utilities. House contains three and a half bath, lots of floor space, a backyard, ample parking, and respectable roommates. If you're interested please call 3015145881 or email me at <a href="mailto:ian16@umbc.edu" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">ian16@umbc.edu</a></div>
      ]]>
    </Body>
    <Summary>Our house is located on Poplar Avenue, walking distance of UMBC. We have a room open for $500 plus utilities. House contains three and a half bath, lots of floor space, a backyard, ample parking,...</Summary>
    <TrackingUrl>https://dev.my.umbc.edu/api/v0/pixel/news/61180/guest@my.umbc.edu/874d83e4ed12c90d9e02f60227b14498/api/pixel</TrackingUrl>
    <Group token="classifieds">Classifieds</Group>
    <GroupUrl>https://dev.my.umbc.edu/groups/classifieds</GroupUrl>
    <AvatarUrl>https://assets4-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/081/27816fed47150f6fda5f96e75013749f/xsmall.png?1434550723</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="original">https://assets2-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/081/27816fed47150f6fda5f96e75013749f/original.png?1434550723</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="xxlarge">https://assets1-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/081/27816fed47150f6fda5f96e75013749f/xxlarge.png?1434550723</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="xlarge">https://assets1-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/081/27816fed47150f6fda5f96e75013749f/xlarge.png?1434550723</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="large">https://assets3-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/081/27816fed47150f6fda5f96e75013749f/large.png?1434550723</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="medium">https://assets3-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/081/27816fed47150f6fda5f96e75013749f/medium.png?1434550723</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="small">https://assets3-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/081/27816fed47150f6fda5f96e75013749f/small.png?1434550723</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="xsmall">https://assets4-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/081/27816fed47150f6fda5f96e75013749f/xsmall.png?1434550723</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="xxsmall">https://assets3-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/081/27816fed47150f6fda5f96e75013749f/xxsmall.png?1434550723</AvatarUrl>
    <Sponsor>Classifieds</Sponsor>
    <PawCount>0</PawCount>
    <CommentCount>0</CommentCount>
    <CommentsAllowed>true</CommentsAllowed>
    <PostedAt>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 07:01:43 -0400</PostedAt>
  </NewsItem>
  <NewsItem contentIssues="false" id="61179" important="false" url="https://dev.my.umbc.edu/posts/61179">
    <Title>Accommodation Cards Needed for Fall</Title>
    <Tagline>SDS receiving registered students' accommodation cards</Tagline>
    <Body>
      <![CDATA[
          <div class="html-content">Students that are already registered with the Office of Student Disability Services to receive accommodations, please stop by Sherman Hall 345 to fill out a paper accommodation card for the fall semester. You can also download an electronic copy from our website and email the completed card to us at <a href="mailto:disability@umbc.edu">disability@umbc.edu</a>. </div>
      ]]>
    </Body>
    <Summary>Students that are already registered with the Office of Student Disability Services to receive accommodations, please stop by Sherman Hall 345 to fill out a paper accommodation card for the fall...</Summary>
    <Website>http://sds.umbc.edu</Website>
    <TrackingUrl>https://dev.my.umbc.edu/api/v0/pixel/news/61179/guest@my.umbc.edu/cf5d2aa6cf7734294312c4236eacbec6/api/pixel</TrackingUrl>
    <Group token="sss">Office of Student Disability Services</Group>
    <GroupUrl>https://dev.my.umbc.edu/groups/sss</GroupUrl>
    <AvatarUrl>https://assets2-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/000/045/7bd1d4fb54807870659b6b4042c75b76/xsmall.png?1544104103</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="original">https://assets3-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/000/045/7bd1d4fb54807870659b6b4042c75b76/original.jpg?1544104103</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="xxlarge">https://assets2-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/000/045/7bd1d4fb54807870659b6b4042c75b76/xxlarge.png?1544104103</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="xlarge">https://assets4-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/000/045/7bd1d4fb54807870659b6b4042c75b76/xlarge.png?1544104103</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="large">https://assets3-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/000/045/7bd1d4fb54807870659b6b4042c75b76/large.png?1544104103</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="medium">https://assets3-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/000/045/7bd1d4fb54807870659b6b4042c75b76/medium.png?1544104103</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="small">https://assets3-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/000/045/7bd1d4fb54807870659b6b4042c75b76/small.png?1544104103</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="xsmall">https://assets2-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/000/045/7bd1d4fb54807870659b6b4042c75b76/xsmall.png?1544104103</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="xxsmall">https://assets3-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/000/045/7bd1d4fb54807870659b6b4042c75b76/xxsmall.png?1544104103</AvatarUrl>
    <Sponsor>Office of Student Disability Services</Sponsor>
    <PawCount>2</PawCount>
    <CommentCount>0</CommentCount>
    <CommentsAllowed>false</CommentsAllowed>
    <PostedAt>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 06:50:28 -0400</PostedAt>
  </NewsItem>
  <NewsItem contentIssues="false" id="61178" important="false" url="https://dev.my.umbc.edu/posts/61178">
    <Title>Political Opinion Research Study. PLEASE PAW</Title>
    <Tagline>As it stands now, which option would you choose?</Tagline>
    <Body>
      <![CDATA[
          <div class="html-content">Hey y'all! As part of an on-going independent research study, my team is conducting this poll! Please vote and paw so that we can get as many people to vote as possible. <div><br></div><div>As it stands now, which option would you choose?</div></div>
      ]]>
    </Body>
    <Summary>Hey y'all! As part of an on-going independent research study, my team is conducting this poll! Please vote and paw so that we can get as many people to vote as possible.     As it stands now,...</Summary>
    <TrackingUrl>https://dev.my.umbc.edu/api/v0/pixel/news/61178/guest@my.umbc.edu/5c41f843cc942d21508ad9b929592a4c/api/pixel</TrackingUrl>
    <Group token="campus-life">Campus Life Discussion Group</Group>
    <GroupUrl>https://dev.my.umbc.edu/groups/campus-life</GroupUrl>
    <AvatarUrl>https://assets4-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/084/99a3812141d4296fa601af58724d8a7f/xsmall.png?1434550697</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="original">https://assets2-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/084/99a3812141d4296fa601af58724d8a7f/original.png?1434550697</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="xxlarge">https://assets2-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/084/99a3812141d4296fa601af58724d8a7f/xxlarge.png?1434550697</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="xlarge">https://assets3-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/084/99a3812141d4296fa601af58724d8a7f/xlarge.png?1434550697</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="large">https://assets3-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/084/99a3812141d4296fa601af58724d8a7f/large.png?1434550697</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="medium">https://assets4-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/084/99a3812141d4296fa601af58724d8a7f/medium.png?1434550697</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="small">https://assets2-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/084/99a3812141d4296fa601af58724d8a7f/small.png?1434550697</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="xsmall">https://assets4-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/084/99a3812141d4296fa601af58724d8a7f/xsmall.png?1434550697</AvatarUrl>
    <AvatarUrl size="xxsmall">https://assets3-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/084/99a3812141d4296fa601af58724d8a7f/xxsmall.png?1434550697</AvatarUrl>
    <Sponsor>Campus Life</Sponsor>
    <PawCount>53</PawCount>
    <CommentCount>20</CommentCount>
    <CommentsAllowed>true</CommentsAllowed>
    <PostedAt>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 00:11:54 -0400</PostedAt>
  </NewsItem>
  <NewsItem contentIssues="true" id="121078" important="false" url="https://dev.my.umbc.edu/posts/121078">
  <Title>New mentoring program connects refugee youth in Baltimore with opportunities to pursue a college education</Title>
  <Body>
    <![CDATA[
    <div class="html-content"><img width="150" height="150" src="https://umbc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/College-JUMP-3-e1469212242893-150x150.jpg" alt="" style="max-width: 100%; height: auto;"><p>A new college access mentoring program for refugees in Baltimore has demonstrated tremendous success in its first year, with all of the graduating seniors in the program accepted into college.</p>
    <p>College JUMP (Journey Upward Mentoring Program) started last year through the Baltimore City Community College (BCCC) Refugee Youth Project (RYP) in partnership with The Shriver Center at UMBC. RYP operates a series of programs that work with refugee youth in Baltimore City and County.</p>
    <p><strong>Christina Smith ’15</strong>, global studies, Sondheim Public Affairs Scholar and Honors College member, serves as the coordinator for the program as UMBC’s Maryland-DC Campus Compact (MDCCC) AmeriCorps VISTA. She says the goal is to work with 11<sup>th</sup> and 12<sup>th</sup> grade refugee students to provide a near-peer college access mentoring program.</p>
    <p>College JUMP has three areas of focus: college exploration, applying to college, and college preparation. Each refugee student in the program is paired with an undergraduate college student who works closely with them to provide resources and assistance throughout the college application process. College JUMP has a team of four undergraduate students who serve as mentor leaders.</p>
    <p>“We want to make sure students start that first day of college feeling prepared for success,” explains Smith.</p>
    <p><strong>Francine Mukobwajana</strong> graduated from Western High School earlier this year and is starting at UMBC in the fall as a biochemistry major. She participated in the program last year and was mentored by <strong>Asma Qaiyumi ’17,</strong> biology and psychology.</p>
    <p>“UMBC was my first choice,” shares Mukobwajana. “Asma helped me a lot. I moved here in 2014, so everything was new to me, but I really appreciated working with Asma.”</p>
    <p>Mukobwajana says Qaiyumi helped her by identifying scholarships, senior year activities, and navigating the college application process. Part of College JUMP also included a campus visit to UMBC.</p>
    <p>“A big part of the preparation is seeing a campus and seeing students going to class, events, and leading tours,” says Qaiyumi. “All of that is important for students like Francine to know.”</p>
    <p>The origins of College JUMP are traced back to when <strong>Jodi Kelber-Kaye</strong>, associate director of the Honors College, received a <a href="https://umbcbreakingground.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">BreakingGround</a> grant to partner with community organizations for her race, poverty, and gender in Baltimore seminar. In 2013, her class worked with the International Rescue Committee (IRC) to create a proposal for encouraging refugee families to remain residents of Baltimore City past their initial resettlement period. After the director of the IRC asked about creating a college mentoring program for refugee youth, her 2014 seminar students partnered with Brittany DeNovellis at RYP to design such a program.</p>
    <p><strong>Eloise Grose</strong>, Shriver Center program coordinator for service-learning, partnered with Kelber-Kaye and others on campus to get the College JUMP funded and started through a MDCCC AmeriCorps VISTA grant.</p>
    <p>DeNovellis, RYP volunteer specialist, was instrumental in the creation and implementation of the project and worked closely with Grose to create the grant proposal to receive funding and also serves as a co-supervisor for the program. Kursten Pickup, RYP coordinator, also assisted in the grant writing process.</p>
    <p>Three years later, College JUMP was a tremendous success in its first year and has provided opportunities for refugees to continue their education and remain in the Baltimore region.</p>
    <p>“If you think about what a refugee family endures, they leave their home country for reasons that are traumatizing for them, and are eventually relocated to the U.S.,” says Kelber-Kaye. “So it’s important for UMBC students to provide welcoming and supportive environments for refugee youth and families as they navigate this complicated aspect of US culture.”</p>
    <p>Building off of incredible results this year including a 100 percent college acceptance rate and FAFSA completion rate, Christina Smith says there are plans to expand the number of students served and add more activities to the program for next year. Thirteen students completed a full year of programming, and an additional 31 students attended events and workshops focused on college access.</p>
    <p>“UMBC values diversity among students and open mindedness and acceptance of a wide range of cultures and backgrounds,” says Smith. “The refugee community in Baltimore can be such an asset not just to the university but to the city and the state of Maryland.”</p>
    <p>Any UMBC student who is interested in serving as a mentor for the program should contact Christina Smith at <a href="mailto:csmith24@umbc.edu" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">csmith24@umbc.edu</a>.</p>
    <p>For more information about service-learning at UMBC, contact <a href="http://shrivercenter.umbc.edu" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">The Shriver Center</a>.</p>
    <p>For more information about the Refugee Youth Project, visit <a href="http://www.refugeeyouthproject.org" rel="nofollow external" class="bo">www.refugeeyouthproject.org</a>.</p>
    <p><em>Image: Photo by Brittany DeNovellis. A group of mentors, students, and a Chesapeake Hall resident pose at the College JUMP kickoff event. </em></p></div>
]]>
  </Body>
  <Summary>A new college access mentoring program for refugees in Baltimore has demonstrated tremendous success in its first year, with all of the graduating seniors in the program accepted into college....</Summary>
  <Website>https://umbc.edu/stories/new-mentoring-program-connects-refugee-youth-in-baltimore-with-opportunities-to-pursue-a-college-education/</Website>
  <TrackingUrl>https://dev.my.umbc.edu/api/v0/pixel/news/121078/guest@my.umbc.edu/ee6e11313a7bf769278f86a551843d90/api/pixel</TrackingUrl>
  <Tag>alumni</Tag>
  <Tag>arts-and-culture</Tag>
  <Tag>biology</Tag>
  <Tag>cahss</Tag>
  <Tag>community</Tag>
  <Tag>globalstudies</Tag>
  <Tag>honorscollege</Tag>
  <Tag>policy-and-society</Tag>
  <Tag>psychology</Tag>
  <Tag>shrivercenter</Tag>
  <Tag>sondheimscholars</Tag>
  <Group token="umbc-news-magazine">UMBC News &amp;amp; Magazine</Group>
  <GroupUrl>https://dev.my.umbc.edu/groups/umbc-news-magazine</GroupUrl>
  <AvatarUrl>https://assets1-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/943/24435aa6207c452e7bc15cc74b42c7bb/xsmall.png?1748556657</AvatarUrl>
  <AvatarUrl size="original">https://assets1-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/943/24435aa6207c452e7bc15cc74b42c7bb/original.png?1748556657</AvatarUrl>
  <AvatarUrl size="xxlarge">https://assets2-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/943/24435aa6207c452e7bc15cc74b42c7bb/xxlarge.png?1748556657</AvatarUrl>
  <AvatarUrl size="xlarge">https://assets2-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/943/24435aa6207c452e7bc15cc74b42c7bb/xlarge.png?1748556657</AvatarUrl>
  <AvatarUrl size="large">https://assets3-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/943/24435aa6207c452e7bc15cc74b42c7bb/large.png?1748556657</AvatarUrl>
  <AvatarUrl size="medium">https://assets1-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/943/24435aa6207c452e7bc15cc74b42c7bb/medium.png?1748556657</AvatarUrl>
  <AvatarUrl size="small">https://assets2-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/943/24435aa6207c452e7bc15cc74b42c7bb/small.png?1748556657</AvatarUrl>
  <AvatarUrl size="xsmall">https://assets1-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/943/24435aa6207c452e7bc15cc74b42c7bb/xsmall.png?1748556657</AvatarUrl>
  <AvatarUrl size="xxsmall">https://assets2-dev.my.umbc.edu/system/shared/avatars/groups/000/001/943/24435aa6207c452e7bc15cc74b42c7bb/xxsmall.png?1748556657</AvatarUrl>
  <Sponsor>UMBC News &amp; Magazine</Sponsor>
  <PawCount>0</PawCount>
  <CommentCount>0</CommentCount>
  <CommentsAllowed>false</CommentsAllowed>
  <PostedAt>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 20:16:02 -0400</PostedAt>
</NewsItem>
</News>
